Van Drew will keep working at the federal level to help lower utility costs and give families relief.

Jefferson Van Drew · New Jersey · Republican

policy impact 2.00 specificity 3.00 extraction confidence 94%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Action: Mr. Riley of New York (for himself and Mr. Van Drew) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means. Short title: No Taxes on Utility Bills Act. Full title: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the deduction of taxes and State-mandated surcharges included on gas or electric utility bills.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Van Drew took a concrete federal legislative step aimed at lowering utility-bill costs by co-sponsoring H.R. 8350, but the bill was only introduced and referred in committee during the lookback window.

partial same_term A for effort

H.R. 8350 (IH) - No Taxes on Utility Bills Act - BILLS-119hr8350ih | Content Details | GovInfo
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 0%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Congressman Jeff Van Drew (R-NJ), along with Congressman Josh Riley (D-NY), introduced H.R. 8350, the No Taxes on Utility Bills Act, which would let taxpayers deduct all taxes and state-mandated surcharges included on their gas and electric bills from their federal taxable income, giving New Jersey families a much-needed tax break.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Van Drew publicly framed the bill as federal relief for utility-cost burdens and confirmed active work on the issue, but this was still proposal-stage action rather than enacted relief.

partial same_term A for effort

Reps. Van Drew, Riley Introduce Bill to Let Families Deduct Taxes and Fees Driving Up Utility Bills | U.S. Representative
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 0%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

April 20, 2026: Congressman Jeff Van Drew (R-NJ), along with Congressman Josh Riley (D-NY), introduced H.R. 8350, the No Taxes on Utility Bills Act, which would let taxpayers deduct all taxes and state-mandated surcharges included on their gas and electric bills from their federal taxable income, giving New Jersey families a much-needed tax break.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The office’s energy-issue page shows Van Drew continuing to pursue federal utility-cost relief in the lookback period, but no official evidence of passage or implementation appears here.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Energy | U.S. Representative
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 0%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Congressman Van Drew announced he is introducing legislation to suspend the federal gas tax for 18 months to lower costs for American families. 'While we can address the federal gas tax in Congress... Working families need real relief, and they need it now.'

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This is another concrete federal affordability push during the lookback window. It targets fuel costs rather than utility bills directly, so it is only partial support for the broader claim.

partial same_term A for effort

Congressman Van Drew Introduces Bill to Suspend Federal Gas Tax | U.S. Representative
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 0%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Van Drew's office said a federal audit of Atlantic City Electric found customer overbilling and federal tax-law errors. Van Drew said he held hearings, pressed ACE for answers, asked FERC to audit the company, and was now seeking refunds, rate decreases, and bill relief for South Jersey customers.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): New lookback-window evidence shows Van Drew continued federal-level oversight activity on electric bills and used a FERC audit result to demand refunds and lower rates. It is meaningful effort, but the item does not show refunds or rate decreases had been implemented by the as-of date.

partial same_term A for effort

Congressman Van Drew Demands Refunds After Federal Audit Finds Atlantic City Electric Overbilled Customers | U.S. Representative
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

FERC's audit page explains that its Division of Audits and Accounting issues audit reports with findings and recommendations, monitors implementation, and lists Atlantic City Electric Company under 2026 electric audits as docket FA25-4.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This official FERC page corroborates that Atlantic City Electric was the subject of a 2026 federal audit. It supports partial progress on the utility-cost commitment, but does not by itself prove enacted relief, refunds, or reduced utility bills.

partial same_term

Audits | Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 82%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): partial. same_term A for effort

Van Drew continued federal-level activity directly related to utility costs during the relevant term, including pressing Atlantic City Electric, seeking a FERC audit, demanding refunds and rate relief after audit findings, and supporting H.R. 8350 to create a federal tax deduction for utility-bill taxes and surcharges. However, the evidence shows oversight, demands, and introduced legislation rather than implemented refunds, rate reductions, or enacted federal relief for families. Because the promised relief was not shown as delivered, but he made meaningful federal efforts toward it, partial credit is appropriate.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 87%

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): partial. same_term A for effort

The promise was broad and process-oriented: to keep working at the federal level to lower utility costs and provide family relief. Evidence shows Van Drew did materially continue that work in office, including introducing or co-leading the No Taxes on Utility Bills Act and separately pushing a federal gas-tax suspension framed as consumer cost relief. However, the record provided shows proposal-stage legislative activity only, with bills introduced and referred but no enactment or implemented federal relief. That supports credit for meaningful effort and partial progress, but not full delivery of lowered utility costs or realized family relief.

provider openai · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 88%