My bipartisan Coastal Trust Fund Act sets up a permanent and reliable funding stream for coastal storm risk management projects like beach nourishment... This legislation changes the status quo by investing $1 billion a year into the Army Corps of Engineers' coastal storm management projects.
Van Drew will pursue legislation to create a permanent, budget-neutral $1 billion annual funding stream for coastal storm risk management projects.
Occurrences
Evidence
Sponsor: Rep. Van Drew, Jefferson [R-NJ-2] (Introduced 02/10/2026). Latest Action: House - 02/10/2026 Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committees on Natural Resources, and the Budget... This bill has the status Introduced.
By Mr. VAN DREW (for himself and Ms. GILLEN): H.R. 7459. A bill to establish the Coastal Storm Risk Management Trust Fund and authorize the use of amounts in such Fund for coastal storm risk management activities of the Corps of Engineers...
Today, Congressman Van Drew... introduced H.R. 7459, the Coastal Trust Fund Act... 'This legislation changes the status quo by investing $1 billion a year into the Army Corps of Engineers' coastal storm management projects. By funding the Coastal Trust Fund with existing offshore energy lease revenues, we earned a budget-neutral score from the Congressional Budget Office...'
Today, Congressman Van Drew hosted Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works Adam Telle... to evaluate the erosion along the Jersey Shore... 'That is why I have introduced the Coastal Trust Fund Act,' Congressman Van Drew continued.
In the long term, I am working on solutions like the Coastal Trust Fund Act to create a more reliable, permanent stream of funding for these kinds of projects.
Assessments
The promise was to pursue legislation creating a permanent, budget-neutral $1 billion annual funding stream for coastal storm risk management projects. Evidence shows Van Drew did pursue that promise by introducing H.R. 7459, the Coastal Trust Fund Act, in February 2026 and continuing to advocate for it afterward. However, the official legislative status provided is only 'Introduced' and referred to committee, with no evidence of House passage, Senate passage, or enactment. Because the claim is framed as pursuing legislation and the evidence confirms active pursuit during the same term, but the ultimate outcome of the bill remains undelivered on the record here, the best score is unresolved rather than delivered or partial.