I will introduce bipartisan legislation to ban AI surveillance pricing at grocery stores and third-party grocery delivery platforms, including clear disclosure requirements and limits on individualized pricing from personal data.

Josh Gottheimer · New Jersey · Democratic

policy impact 0.82 specificity 0.93 extraction confidence 99%

Commitment kind: outcome. Promised action: Advance the No Rigged Grocery Prices Act.. Promised outcome: Surveillance pricing is banned in grocery stores and third-party delivery services, with additional consumer protections around substitutions and disclosures.. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired. Federal House consumer protection and AI pricing legislation introduced by Gottheimer during his current term.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

That’s why I’m proudly introducing new bipartisan legislation, the No Rigged Grocery Prices Act, so that AI isn’t allowed to jack up the prices you pay for groceries when you go to the store or have them delivered at home.

Gottheimer commits to introducing the No Rigged Grocery Prices Act to prohibit AI-driven surveillance pricing for groceries and delivery services.

RELEASE: Gottheimer Announces New Bipartisan Legislation to Ban AI Surveillance Pricing at Grocery Stores & Delivery Services
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.4-mini

Introduced the bipartisan No Rigged Grocery Prices Act with Rep. Lawler (NY-17). It bans surveillance pricing in grocery stores and on third-party delivery services while implementing other commonsense consumer protections around substitutions and disclosures.

Gottheimer highlighted the No Rigged Grocery Prices Act, which would ban surveillance pricing in grocery stores and third-party delivery services.

ICYMI: As AI Advances, Gottheimer Leads Bipartisan Charge to Put Up Immediate Guardrails
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.5

Evidence

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

A class-action lawsuit filed June 11 accuses The Washington Post of 'surveillance pricing' and says it used subscriber data to maximize renewal prices.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Recent litigation shows surveillance pricing is still a live issue, but it does not show Josh Gottheimer introduced the promised federal bill.

unresolved unknown

Scathing class-action lawsuit accuses Washington Post of surveillance pricing: 'Covert data-harvesting'
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 74%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The Business Council is funding opposition to Letitia James' One Fair Price Package, which would outlaw surveillance or algorithmic pricing using shoppers' personal data.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This is a current state-level push to regulate the same practice, but it is not evidence that Gottheimer delivered on his federal promise.

unresolved unknown

NY Business Council bashes AG Tish James' ban on 'surveillance pricing' as anti-consumer
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 78%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The New York City Council introduced bills to ban surveillance pricing and dynamic pricing, including use of shoppers' location or browsing history to tailor prices.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This is a concrete last-window legislative move on the issue, but it is local action and does not confirm a federal Gottheimer introduction.

unresolved unknown

NYC bills could outlaw 'dynamic pricing' that charges different prices for same product
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 80%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

FTC staff found intermediaries worked with at least 250 clients, including grocery stores, and could use location, demographics, browsing patterns, shopping history, and mouse movements to tailor pricing.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Official FTC findings establish that the underlying practice exists across grocery retail, but they do not show Gottheimer fulfilled the promise by introducing the bill.

unresolved unknown

FTC Surveillance Pricing Study Indicates Wide Range of Personal Data Used to Set Individualized Consumer Prices
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): never. unknown

By June 12, 2026, there is no clear evidence that Josh Gottheimer introduced the promised bipartisan federal bill targeting AI or surveillance pricing at grocery stores and third-party grocery delivery platforms with the specified disclosure and individualized-pricing limits. The available evidence confirms the policy problem exists and shows related action by other officials, including federal bills led by other members and state/local proposals, but not a Gottheimer-led introduction matching this promise. Because the promise was specifically to introduce legislation, and the record reviewed does not show that he did so, this is best scored as not delivered rather than partial.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 84%