Protect the right to keep and bear arms, support constitutional carry, and oppose red-flag laws.

Pat Harrigan · North Carolina · Republican

policy impact 0.78 specificity 0.77 extraction confidence 98%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

He will always fight to protect our right to keep and bear arms, believes in the fundamental right of Constitutional carry, and rejects any attempt to impose red flags on those exercising their Second Amendment rights.

Promises to defend gun rights, support constitutional carry, and oppose red-flag laws.

Pat on the Issues | Pat Harrigan for Congress
campaign · other · model gpt-5.4-mini

Evidence

unverified · Source version 24076 · locator unknown

H.R. 645 is titled the National Constitutional Carry Act. GovInfo identifies it as introduced in the House on January 23, 2025, with Pat Harrigan listed among the sponsors. The bill text in Congress.gov says it would enforce the rights protected by the Second and Fourteenth Amendments against the states.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Harrigan took a concrete legislative step aligned with constitutional carry by sponsoring a national constitutional carry bill, but the record shows only introduction and referral, not enactment.

partial same_term A for effort

H.R. 645 (IH) - National Constitutional Carry Act - GovInfo
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 24077 · locator unknown

The bill history shows H.R. 645 was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary and later accrued additional cosponsors in 2025 and 2026, including Harrigan as a sponsor in the Congressional Record index.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This confirms the measure remained at the committee/introduction stage during the lookback and did not advance to passage, so the promise was not fully delivered through legislation.

never same_term A for effort

H.R. 645 - National Constitutional Carry Act - Congress.gov
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 24078 · locator unknown

GovInfo lists H.R. 8332, introduced April 16, 2026, with Pat Harrigan as sponsor. The action states the bill was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary and additionally to the Committees on Armed Services and Veterans' Affairs. The full title is 'To provide concealed carry privileges to qualified special operators.'

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): In the lookback window, Harrigan pursued a firearms-access bill that supports the broader pro-carry promise, showing continued active effort rather than abandonment.

partial same_term A for effort

H.R. 8332 (IH) - Special Operations Forces Concealed Carry Act - Related Documents - GovInfo
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 24079 · locator unknown

The press release says Harrigan introduced the Special Operations Forces Concealed Carry Act to extend federal concealed carry authority to certain special operators and says the bill 'does not create new rights or weaken any safeguard' but instead extends an existing framework. It also says the bill covers qualified special operators and directs DOJ, DoD, and VA actions if enacted.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This is a clear, concrete affirmative step in the same policy area as the claim, but it is still only an introduction, so it does not prove the broader pledge was delivered.

partial same_term A for effort

Congressman Pat Harrigan Introduces the Special Operations Forces Concealed Carry Act to Extend Concealed Carry Rights to Elite Military Veterans
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 24080 · locator unknown

Harrigan's office states he is working to extend federal concealed-carry authority to elite military personnel and repeats that the proposal does not add new rights or weaken firearm safeguards. It describes the bill as extending concealed carry authority to qualified special operators.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This reinforces that Harrigan was actively advancing pro-carry legislation during the lookback window, but it still reflects proposed legislation rather than completed policy delivery.

partial same_term A for effort

Daily Signal: GOP Veteran Harrigan to Deliver Concealed-Carry Rights to Special Forces
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 57902 · locator unknown

Jul 14, 2026, 05:32 PM | 119th Congress, 2nd Session Vote Question: On Passage Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act Status: Passed Harrigan | Harrigan | Republican | NC | Yea

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Harrigan voted yes on House passage of H.R. 1181, a firearms-purchase privacy bill, showing concrete pro-gun-rights effort in the same congressional term. This is not full delivery of the constitutional-carry/red-flag-law pledge because it only passed the House.

partial same_term A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 57904 · locator unknown

Last Action Date Listed July 15, 2026 Action Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Full Title An Act To prohibit payment card networks and covered entities from requiring the use of or assigning merchant category codes that distinguish a firearms retailer from general-merchandise retailer or sporting-goods retailer, and for other purposes.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): GovInfo shows the House-passed firearms-purchase privacy bill was referred to the Senate Banking Committee, not enacted. This supports keeping the broader promise unresolved/not delivered while crediting continued effort.

unresolved same_term

H.R. 1181 (RFS) - Protecting Privacy in Purchases Act - BILLS-119hr1181rfs | Content Details | GovInfo
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 70080 · locator unknown

May 21, 2026, 06:12 PM | 119th Congress, 2nd Session Vote Question: On Passage Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act Status: Passed Harrigan | Harrigan | Republican | NC | Yea

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Harrigan voted yea on House passage of H.R. 1041, a Second Amendment-related bill. This is concrete pro-gun-rights effort in the same term, but it is narrower than the constitutional-carry/red-flag pledge.

partial same_term A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 70082 · locator unknown

Last Action Date Listed June 2, 2026 Action Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs Bill Version Referred in Senate (RFS)

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): GovInfo shows the same bill was referred to the Senate Veterans' Affairs Committee, not enacted. That keeps this effort from proving full delivery of the broader promise.

unresolved same_term

H.R. 1041 (RFS) - Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act - BILLS-119hr1041rfs | Content Details | GovInfo
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): never. same_term A for effort

The promise was to protect gun rights, support constitutional carry, and oppose red-flag laws. The evidence shows Harrigan took concrete pro-gun legislative action in office, including sponsoring or backing the National Constitutional Carry Act and introducing the Special Operations Forces Concealed Carry Act. However, the cited measures were introduced and referred to committee, not enacted, and the record provided does not show a completed federal policy change on constitutional carry or successful blocking/repeal of red-flag laws attributable to him. Under the rubric, a serious legislative attempt that did not achieve the promised outcome is scored as never with effort credit.

provider openai · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 95%