unverified · Source version 58244 · locator unknown
04/07/2025 - Rep. Brown, Shontel M. [D-OH-11]
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Official Congress.gov cosponsor list shows Brown joined H.R. 2550, the Protect America's Workforce Act, during later federal service. This is concrete effort but not final delivery.
unverified · Source version 58246 · locator unknown
Latest Action: Senate - 12/15/2025 Received in the Senate. (All Actions )
Roll Call Votes: There has been 1 roll call vote
Tracker:
This bill has the status Passed House
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Official Congress.gov status shows the relevant bill had passed the House but was only received in the Senate, with no enactment shown. As of the refresh, the restoration commitment remains unresolved despite effort.
unverified · Source version 82509 · locator unknown
The Senate convened for a pro forma session at 1:30 p.m. Senator Britt presided and no business was conducted.
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): During the lookback window, the Senate held only a pro forma session with no business conducted, so there was no new Senate action delivering H.R. 2550 or restoring the covered bargaining rights.
unverified · Source version 82511 · locator unknown
Mr. President, notwithstanding rule XXII, I ask unanimous consent that the Senate proceed to the immediate consideration of H.R. 2550, which is at the desk; further, that the bill be considered read a third time and passed, and the motion to reconsider be considered made and laid upon the table.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. Is there objection?
The Senator from Florida.
Mr. SCOTT of Florida. Mr. President, I object.
The PRESIDING OFFICER. The objection is heard.
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): A Senate unanimous-consent attempt to pass H.R. 2550 was blocked by objection shortly before the lookback window. This is concrete continued effort but not enactment, leaving Brown's restoration commitment unresolved.
VA’s latest actions create uncertainty about how those protections will be applied while the legal challenges continue.
Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): Within the lookback window, AFGE reported continuing uncertainty over its VA agreement and an October 16 motion seeking clarification of contractual protections. This supports an unresolved restoration outcome; it does not document additional effort by Brown.
unverified · Source version 93045 · locator unknown
For the foregoing reasons, the Court finds that the October 7, 2026, re-termination of the CBA is VOID
Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Immediately before the lookback window, the district court voided BOP’s renewed contract termination and required the agreement to remain effective through May 28, 2029, unless the court permits earlier termination. This establishes limited judicial restoration under a preliminary injunction, without establishing government-wide delivery or attributing the relief to Brown.