Protect the right to keep and bear arms.

Michael Cloud · Texas · Republican

policy impact 0.62 specificity 0.46 extraction confidence 98%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Michael Cloud will protect your right to keep and bear arms.

Cloud pledges to defend Second Amendment gun rights.

Survey of 2018 House campaign websites
archival · campaign_site · model gpt-5.4-mini

Evidence

unverified · Source version 26334 · locator unknown

Congress.gov identifies Rep. Michael Cloud as sponsor of H.R.2039, introduced 03/11/2025. The latest action is referral to a House subcommittee, and the tracker remains at Introduced.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Cloud introduced legislation directly aimed at preventing emergency declarations from being used to impose gun control. The bill has not passed either chamber, so this supports partial progress rather than full delivery; no newer May 30-June 1, 2026 enactment was found.

partial same_term A for effort

All Info - H.R.2039 - Protecting the Right to Keep and Bear Arms Act of 2025 | Congress.gov
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 91%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 26335 · locator unknown

The House Oversight Committee reported that the May 14 hearing examined ATF's Second Amendment record and that Rep. Cloud questioned ATF about discipline for a Tiahrt-protected data leak.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This is recent congressional oversight by Cloud on gun-owner privacy and Second Amendment issues. It advances the commitment through oversight, but it does not itself enact a durable legal protection; no newer official action in the May 30-June 1, 2026 lookback window was found.

partial same_term A for effort

Hearing Wrap Up: Second Amendment Must be Safeguarded Against Overreach - United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 60686 · locator 2326

Today, the Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel released a legal opinion concluding that the federal prohibition may not be enforced against licensed dealers selling handguns to otherwise law-abiding adults ages 18 to 20 consistent with the Second Amendment.

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): Within the lookback window, DOJ announced an OLC opinion limiting enforcement of federal handgun-sale restrictions for law-abiding adults ages 18 to 20. This is concrete federal executive action aligned with protecting gun rights, but it is not a Cloud-sponsored legislative enactment and covers only one subset of Second Amendment policy.

partial same_term

Office of Public Affairs | Justice Department Concludes Federal Ban on Handgun Sales to 18 to 20-Year-Olds is Unconstitutional and Cannot Be Criminally Enforced | United States Department of Justice
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 86%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 60688 · locator 2164

Today, the Justice Department filed suit against the City of San Jose, California, and the San Jose Police Department for charging private individuals unreasonable fees to exercise their Second Amendment right to lawfully carry a firearm.

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): DOJ filed a Second Amendment enforcement lawsuit during the lookback window. It is aligned with the commitment but is executive-branch litigation, not Cloud-authored enactment, so it supports only partial federal progress on the broad promise.

partial same_term

Office of Public Affairs | Justice Department Sues San Jose for Unconstitutional $1600 Firearm Permit Fee | United States Department of Justice
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 84%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 60690 · locator unknown

This Court should reverse the judgments below. Respectfully submitted, JAY ALAN SEKULOW Counsel of Record

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Cloud joined a Supreme Court amicus effort in Second Amendment rifle-ban cases, showing concrete same-term advocacy. Because an amicus brief does not itself change law and the Court had not ruled, this is effort without delivery.

unresolved same_term A for effort

20260904134859717_25-238%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20The%20American%20Center%20for%20Law%20and%20Justice.pdf
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 83%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 60690 · locator unknown

LIST OF AMICI CURIAE UNITED STATES REPRESENTATIVES Andrew Clyde (GA-09) Jodey Arrington (TX-19) Brian Babin (TX-36) James R. Baird (IN-04) Nicholas J. Begich III (AK-AL) Sheri Biggs (SC-03) Lauren Boebert (CO-04) Josh Brecheen (OK-02) Tim Burchett (TN-02) Eric Burlison (MO-07) Ben Cline (VA-06) Michael Cloud (TX-27)

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The official Supreme Court filing lists Michael Cloud among the House-member amici, tying the September 2026 Second Amendment litigation effort directly to Cloud.

unresolved same_term A for effort

20260904134859717_25-238%20Amicus%20Brief%20of%20The%20American%20Center%20for%20Law%20and%20Justice.pdf
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 60692 · locator unknown

Sep 04 2026 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, December 2, 2026. VIDED.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The Supreme Court docket shows the relevant Second Amendment case was still pending and set for future argument, so the amicus effort had not yet produced a court-delivered outcome in the lookback window.

unresolved same_term

Docket for 25-238
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 60694 · locator 2361

To amend title 18, United States Code, to discontinue the collection by the Federal Government of firearm transaction records of discontinued firearms businesses, to require the destruction of such already collected records, and for other purposes.

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): Cloud introduced the No REGISTRY Rights Act, a bill aligned with protecting gun-owner privacy and Second Amendment rights. GovInfo shows it was introduced and referred, but this evidence does not show enactment.

unresolved same_term A for effort

H.R. 563 (IH) - No Retaining Every Gun In a System That Restricts Your Rights Act - BILLS-119hr563ih | Content Details | GovInfo
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 87%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): never. unknown A for effort

Cloud took same-term action aligned with the promise by sponsoring H.R.2039 to restrict emergency-based federal gun control and by using Oversight Committee questioning on ATF/Tiahrt Amendment issues. But the bill remains only introduced/referred and the oversight activity did not itself create a durable legal protection for the right to keep and bear arms. Because the promised policy outcome has not been delivered, this is a failed but serious legislative/oversight effort rather than fulfillment.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%