Advocate for federal funding for community projects across Washington's Third District.

Marie Gluesenkamp Perez · Washington · Democratic

spending impact 0.42 specificity 0.78 extraction confidence 89%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Occurrences

As a member of the House Appropriations Committee, Rep. Gluesenkamp Perez will continue advocating for the projects.

She committed to keep advocating for the district's FY27 community project funding requests in the House Appropriations process.

Gluesenkamp Perez Seeks More than $40 million for 20 Community Projects Across Her District
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.4-mini

Evidence

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

On June 3, 2026, her office said the House Appropriations Committee adopted her amendment adding more than $5 million to fully fund the Chemical Safety Board, which was investigating the Longview Nippon Dynawave mill incident in Washington's 3rd District.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Concrete district-linked funding action. This is a partial match to the broader promise because she secured committee action for a local federal safety investigation, but it does not show district-wide community-project funding across the whole district.

partial same_term A for effort

Home
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 90%

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): partial. same_term A for effort

The promise is broad: advocating for federal funding for community projects across Washington's 3rd District. The evidence shows a concrete same-term funding-related action by Rep. Gluesenkamp Perez: the House Appropriations Committee adopted her amendment adding more than $5 million to fully fund the Chemical Safety Board work tied to a district incident. That demonstrates real advocacy and a material funding advance connected to the district, so she deserves credit for effort and some delivery. But the cited action is narrow and issue-specific, not clear evidence of district-wide community-project funding across the full district scope promised. On that record, the best judgment is partial rather than full delivery.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 88%