introduced the Heat Workforce Standards Act to protect workers from Biden-era heat standards they say threaten jobs and create new safety risks
Work to block harmful Biden-era heat rules that they say threaten jobs and create new safety risks for American workers.
Occurrences
Evidence
Risch's Senate office says Jim Risch, Bill Cassidy, and colleagues introduced the Heat Workforce Standards Act to block Biden-era heat standards; Risch said the bill would stop implementation.
The bill text lists Cassidy for himself and Risch, and Section 3 bars the Secretary of Labor from finalizing, implementing, or enforcing OSHA's 2024 heat standard or a substantially similar standard.
The Congressional Record records S.4427 by Cassidy for himself, Risch, Tuberville, Crapo, Budd, Daines, Sheehy, Cornyn, and Tillis; it was referred to HELP.
HELP Republicans say Cassidy led 15 Republican senators, including Jim Risch, urging DOL to address concerns with the Biden proposed heat rule as rulemaking continued.
OSHA's rulemaking page says the proposed rule was published August 30, 2024; the public hearing ran June 16-July 2, 2025; post-hearing comments ended October 30, 2025.
FastDemocracy lists S.4427 as Introduced, with last action on April 29, 2026: read twice and referred to HELP; Risch is listed as a cosponsor, and no votes are shown.
OSHA's current rulemaking page says the informal public hearing ended on July 2, 2025 and the post-hearing comment period ended on October 30, 2025; the page does not show a final rule, withdrawal, or statutory block.
The Congressional Record shows S.4427 was introduced by Cassidy for himself and Risch and referred to HELP after being read twice.
Assessments
Risch took concrete federal action aligned with the promise by co-sponsoring S.4427 to bar OSHA from finalizing or enforcing the heat standard and by joining pressure on the Labor Department. But the supplied official and legislative evidence shows only bill introduction and committee referral, while OSHA's rulemaking page still shows the heat rule as pending rather than blocked, withdrawn, or nullified. Because he materially pursued the promise but the blocking outcome has not yet been achieved and remains possible during his current service, this is best scored as unresolved rather than delivered or never.