one amendment would also block DHS employees or contractors from seizing ballots or election materials stored under federal law
Block DHS employees or contractors from seizing ballots or election materials stored under federal law.
Occurrences
Evidence
Slotkin said HSGAC Republicans blocked her amendment that would have barred DHS employees or contractors from seizing ballots or election material stored under 52 U.S.C. 20701.
GovInfo's official U.S. Code entry identifies 52 U.S.C. 20701 as the federal election-record retention provision governing preservation and deposit of election records.
Ms. Slotkin submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to S. Con. Res. 33, relating to prohibiting federal seizures of ballots and state voter rolls.
A Senator Slotkin amendment to prohibit DHS agents from being used to seize election ballots was among the amendments HSGAC Republicans blocked from the final bill.
Sen. Slotkin’s office said committee Republicans blocked her amendment to prohibit DHS agents from being used to seize election ballots.
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee minority statement lists a Slotkin amendment that would prohibit DHS from being used to seize election ballots and says Republicans blocked it in committee.
The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee minority statement says Slotkin offered an amendment to prohibit DHS agents from being used to seize election ballots, and that Republicans blocked it along with the rest of the Democratic amendments.
The Congressional Record shows SA 5094, a Slotkin amendment to prohibit federal seizures of ballots and state voter rolls, and says it was ordered to lie on the table.
Assessments
Slotkin made a concrete legislative attempt to deliver this promise by filing and offering amendments to prohibit DHS employees or contractors from seizing ballots and election materials covered by 52 U.S.C. 20701. The evidence shows those amendments were blocked in the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and were not adopted or enacted. Because she seriously advanced the proposal but did not secure the promised policy outcome, this is best scored as never with effort credit.
Elissa Slotkin made a concrete Senate amendment to bar DHS employees or contractors from seizing ballots or election materials, but committee Republicans blocked it before enactment. That is a serious legislative attempt, but the promised outcome was not achieved.
Slotkin materially advanced the policy by filing and offering a Senate amendment to prohibit DHS agents or contractors from seizing ballots and related election materials, but the amendment was blocked in committee and not enacted. That is a serious legislative attempt that failed, so the promise was not fulfilled.
The evidence indicates Slotkin pursued the promised policy through an HSGAC amendment to bar DHS employees or contractors from seizing ballots or election materials stored under 52 U.S.C. 20701, but the amendment was blocked in committee and was not adopted. Because this was a serious federal legislative attempt during her Senate term but did not become law or otherwise deliver the promised prohibition, the correct outcome is not delivered, with effort credit.