Democrats would not support new funding for ICE and Border Patrol unless it included commonsense guardrails.
Not support new funding for ICE and Border Patrol unless it includes commonsense guardrails.
Occurrences
Evidence
“That’s why my Democratic colleagues and I have been clear since February: you won’t get our votes on new funding for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol unless it includes commonsense guardrails to rein in these agencies’ abuses.”
“The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding bill recently signed into law provides a full year of funding to the Secret Service, FEMA, TSA, and Coast Guard. It does not include any additional funding for ICE and Border Patrol.”
Cortez Masto said Democrats had been clear since February that Republicans would not get their votes on new funding for ICE and Border Patrol unless it included commonsense guardrails, and said Democrats had been blocking funding because of abuses of power.
The release listed requested reforms: no detention or deportation of U.S. citizens based on appearance, judicial warrants for home entry, visible badge numbers, no masks, body cameras, and de-escalation training.
The office said the DHS funding bill recently signed into law funded the Secret Service, FEMA, TSA, and Coast Guard and did not include additional funding for ICE and Border Patrol.
The budget resolution instructed the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee and Judiciary Committee to report changes increasing the deficit by not more than $70 billion each for fiscal years 2026 through 2035, with reserve-fund language relating to immigration enforcement and border security policy.
On S. Con. Res. 33, as amended, the Senate agreed to the concurrent resolution 50-48; Cortez Masto was recorded as Nay.
S. 2 appropriated $13.02 billion to U.S. Customs and Border Protection for immigration enforcement activities and $31.075 billion to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement for immigration enforcement activities, among other DHS appropriations.
On Padilla Amendment No. 5808 to S. 2, with the stated purpose to make appropriations for transparency and accountability, the amendment was rejected 46-53; Cortez Masto voted Yea.
On the Durbin Amendment No. 5806 motion, which would repurpose ICE funds for DACA processing and prohibit use of funds to arrest, detain, deport, or remove DACA recipients, the motion was rejected 48-51; Cortez Masto voted Yea.
On passage of S. 2, as amended, the Senate passed the bill 52-47; Cortez Masto was recorded as Nay.
Assessments
Cortez Masto's promise was framed as a personal support/vote condition, not a guarantee that Congress would block all ICE or Border Patrol funding. In the same Senate term, she publicly reiterated that she would not vote for new ICE and Border Patrol funding without guardrails, voted for guardrail-related amendments, and then voted Nay on S. 2 after those protections failed, even though the bill contained substantial new ICE and CBP funding. Supporting a separate DHS bill that her office said did not add ICE or Border Patrol funding does not undercut the pledge.
Cortez Masto publicly maintained the condition that she would not support new ICE or Border Patrol funding without guardrails, and the cited DHS funding measure did not include additional ICE or Border Patrol funding. That supports partial credit for adhering to the pledge posture in the same federal Senate term, but the record provided does not show that she actually blocked a new funding bill lacking guardrails or secured guardrails on new funding, so full delivery is not established.