I am also pleased to see that this legislation fixes California’s left-wing Proposition 12 by clarifying that states and localities cannot impose unreasonable livestock production standards on producers across the country.
Will support legislation that clarifies states and localities cannot impose unreasonable livestock production standards on producers across the country.
Occurrences
Evidence
House-passed H.R.2 included Subtitle G, Protecting Interstate Commerce. Section 11701 said a state or locality shall not impose a standard or condition on production or manufacture of an agricultural product sold in interstate commerce when production occurs in another state and the added standard exceeds federal and producing-state/local requirements.
Roll Call 284 was On Passage of H.R.2, Agriculture and Nutrition Act of 2018. The vote status was Passed, 213 yea to 211 nay. The vote list records Womack, Republican, Arkansas, as Yea.
The enrolled H.R.2 text’s table of contents lists Sec. 10114, Interstate commerce, under hemp production. Searches for the House-passed language titled Prohibition against interference by State and local governments with production or manufacture of items in other States and its agricultural-product production standard text do not return that provision in the enrolled bill.
Congress.gov summarizes H.R.4417 as restricting state and local governments from imposing certain standards or conditions on preharvest production of agricultural products sold in interstate commerce when production occurs in another state and the added standard exceeds federal and producing-state/local requirements. Latest action: referred to House Agriculture and Judiciary; status Introduced.
Congress.gov says S.1326 restricts state and local governments from imposing certain standards or conditions on preharvest production of agricultural products in another state. Latest action: read twice and referred to the Senate Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry; status Introduced.
Assessments
Womack's promise was framed as supporting legislation, not guaranteeing enactment. During the 115th Congress he voted for House-passed H.R.2, which included Subtitle G/Section 11701 language barring state and local governments from imposing added agricultural production or manufacturing standards on out-of-state products sold in interstate commerce. That matches the promised federal clarification. The provision did not survive into the enacted farm bill, and later similar bills remained introduced, so the broader policy was not enacted; however, the specific candidate commitment to support such legislation was fulfilled in the same term.