I will protect the Specialty Crop Block Grant Program from USDA cost-sharing or matching requirements.

Adam Gray · California · Democratic

policy impact 4.00 specificity 1.00 extraction confidence 98%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Congressman Gray was able to unanimously pass an additional amendment to the Farm Bill that will help protect the Specialty Crop Block Grant Program by prohibiting the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) from implementing dangerous cost-sharing or matching requirements.

Gray supported an amendment blocking USDA from imposing cost-sharing or matching requirements on the Specialty Crop Block Grant Program.

GRAY BACKED FARM BILL PASSES THROUGH FULL HOUSE WITH BIPARTISAN SUPPORT | Congressman Adam Gray
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.4-mini

Evidence

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

"Most recently, on the House floor, Congressman Gray was able to unanimously pass an additional amendment to the Farm Bill that will help protect the Specialty Crop Block Grant Program by prohibiting the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) from implementing dangerous cost-sharing or matching requirements."

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Gray’s office says he secured House-floor adoption of an amendment blocking USDA from adding cost-sharing or matching requirements to the Specialty Crop Block Grant Program.

delivered same_term A for effort

GRAY BACKED FARM BILL PASSES THROUGH FULL HOUSE WITH BIPARTISAN SUPPORT | Congressman Adam Gray
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

"No federal cost sharing or matching requirement. Cost share/match should not be included in the submitted application nor subsequent performance or financial reports."

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): USDA AMS currently states the Specialty Crop Block Grant Program has no federal matching requirement, which directly matches the claim’s promised protection.

delivered same_term

Specialty Crop Block Grant Program | Agricultural Marketing Service
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 99%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

"The FY 2026 Specialty Crop Block Grant Program (SCBGP) application period is open through June 8, 2026."

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The program is actively operating under the no-match rule as of the current application cycle, indicating the protection remains in effect rather than being reversed or blocked.

delivered same_term

Specialty Crop Block Grant Program | Agricultural Marketing Service
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Section 10001 adds: "No cost-sharing or matching requirements.--The Secretary may not impose any cost-sharing or matching requirement on any award or sub-award" made under the Specialty Crop Block Grant section.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The House-engrossed farm bill contains the precise Specialty Crop Block Grant Program protection Gray sought, showing the amendment's substance reached the House-passed bill.

partial same_term A for effort

H.R. 7567 (EH) - Farm, Food, and National Security Act of 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The Senate Agriculture Committee listed "S. ____, Agricultural Act of 2026, as an original bill, with amendments" as "Not Agreed to by Roll Call Vote: 10-11."

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The Senate farm bill vehicle did not advance from committee as of the latest official record found, so the cost-share protection has not been shown to be enacted into law.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Business Meeting | Senate Committee On Agriculture, Nutrition & Forestry
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): partial. same_term A for effort

Gray materially advanced the promised protection during his House term: his amendment barring USDA cost-sharing or matching requirements for Specialty Crop Block Grant awards was adopted into the House-passed 2026 farm bill, and USDA's current SCBGP materials still state there is no federal match requirement. But the House-passed farm bill provision has not been shown to be enacted into law, and the Senate farm bill vehicle had not advanced from committee as of the latest evidence. Because the durable federal protection Gray promised has only passed one chamber and remains unenacted, this is partial fulfillment rather than full delivery.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 91%

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): partial. same_term A for effort

Gray appears to have materially advanced the promised protection by winning House adoption of a Farm Bill amendment barring USDA from imposing cost-sharing or matching requirements on the Specialty Crop Block Grant Program. That is strong evidence of serious action in office. However, the record provided does not show that this amendment became enacted federal law, and USDA's 2026 program guidance showing no matching requirement does not by itself establish that Gray caused or secured that outcome; it may reflect continuing agency policy rather than a completed statutory protection attributable to him. Because he made a substantial legislative effort and achieved House passage of his amendment, but full, clearly attributable delivery is not established from the evidence, partial credit is most appropriate.

provider openai · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 80%