First, we maintain the new Member security program, increase funding for the U.S. Capitol Police, fully fund the request from the Office of Legislative Counsel, increase funding for the Green and Gold Congressional Aide Program...
Maintain the new Member security program.
Occurrences
we are maintaining the new and existing security programs at the levels recommended by the House Sergeant at Arms and providing them with the requested funds to continue their operations.
Evidence
"Today’s announcement doubles that monthly allotment to $10,000 and extends the program through November 21, 2025." The release says the House launched a pilot program in July 2025 allowing Members to use $5,000 per month for personal security and that the September action increased the amount and extended the program.
The guide states that in August 2025 the House established the Personal Security Pilot Program, which allows Members to hire licensed and insured individuals or companies for personal protective, residential, or event security, provides up to $10,000 per month, and was authorized through November 30, 2025.
The summary says the bill invests in Member security initiatives including residential security for both House and Senate Members and district office security.
Assessments
The available evidence shows the House personal security program for Members was not only continued but temporarily expanded in 2025, with the monthly allotment increased and the authorization extended into late 2025. That supports some delivery on the promise to maintain the new program. But the record here does not show a permanent or longer-term continuation, and it does not show Valadao personally sponsored, led, or materially advanced the continuation beyond being a Member during the period. On a federal officeholder-credit standard, that supports partial rather than full delivery.
The available evidence shows the House’s new Member personal security program was continued and even expanded in 2025, which aligns with the promise to maintain it. However, the proof ties the action to bipartisan House Administration leadership generally, not specifically to David Valadao as the principal driver, sponsor, or decisive advocate. In a federal legislative context, continuation by the institution without clear candidate-specific credit supports partial rather than full delivery. The action occurred during the same term.