help foster youth keep their vouchers for the duration of their education by providing a grace period for those who may be temporarily struggling with their academic progress
Will help foster youth keep their Education and Training Vouchers through the duration of their education by providing a grace period for temporary academic struggles.
Occurrences
the State may establish a grace period to allow a youth to continue participation in activities described in paragraph (4)(A), after an assessment and consultation with the youth, if the State determines that reasonable circumstances warrant the grace period
introduced by Reps. Judy Chu (CA-28) and Rep. Nathaniel Moran (TX-01)
Evidence
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The reported bill amends section 477(i) so a state may establish a grace period when reasonable circumstances warrant it, allowing a foster youth to keep participating while making progress toward an education or training program.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The House report says H.R. 7463 would let states set a grace period for foster youth to maintain voucher eligibility by showing progress toward completion, and would raise the annual voucher cap.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
GovInfo lists H.R. 7432 as Referred in Senate with the action: received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. The Senate-referred text includes a state grace period for foster youth to continue ETV participation after assessment and consultation when reasonable circumstances warrant it.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Rep. Chu’s office said the House passed the Fostering the Future Act by voice vote and that it included the text of her Foster Youth Postsecondary Education Access and Success Act, including a grace period for foster youth temporarily struggling with academic progress to keep their vouchers.
Assessments
Chu materially advanced the promised ETV grace-period policy: her bill text was incorporated into the House-passed Fostering the Future Act, and official bill text/report language shows it would let states provide a grace period so foster youth could keep Education and Training Voucher eligibility during temporary academic struggles. But the evidence shows the measure had only passed the House and was referred to the Senate Finance Committee, with no enactment into law. Because the promised policy change was not delivered despite a serious legislative attempt, this is a failed promise with an effort badge rather than full or partial delivery.
Judy Chu’s bill, H.R. 7463, would have created a state-authorized grace period so foster youth could keep Education and Training Vouchers during temporary academic struggles, but the evidence shows it was only reported out of the House and had not been enacted. That is a serious legislative attempt, but the promised outcome was not actually delivered into law.