I hope we can work together before Full Committee to restore this funding.
I will work to restore Brownfields Program funding before full committee consideration.
Occurrences
Evidence
EPA announced May 20, 2024 that the City of Carson in Barragán’s district would receive a $500,000 Brownfields community-wide assessment grant, part of $3 million in Brownfields MAC grants in southern California.
EPA’s FY 2026 Brownfields Multipurpose, Assessment, and Cleanup Grant Competition had an application deadline of January 28, 2026 and was soliciting Brownfields grant applications in fall 2025.
EPA announced an estimated $25 million in FY 2026 supplemental funds for eligible Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund grants, with a request deadline of March 16, 2026.
The House Appropriations Committee said it completed action on all twelve FY 2026 appropriations bills and advanced full-year funding; this indicates appropriations action moved forward, but the release does not identify a Barragán-led Brownfields restoration before full committee consideration.
The committee report for the FY27 Interior bill says EPA's Environmental Programs and Management account includes "administrative costs of the brownfields program" and recommends $2,293,668,000 for that account.
The committee said all 12 FY2027 bills had been reported through subcommittees and the full committee; Chairman Simpson specifically referred to his FY2027 Interior and Environment Appropriations Bill passing out of full committee.
The current FY27 bill text page says it reflects the most up-to-date information available and lists the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies filed bill as H.R. 9171, filed report 119-687, full committee mark, and bill report.
The House Committee Repository lists the full committee markup for June 3, 2026, and shows the FY27 Interior full committee mark and report were added before the meeting, with roll-call votes added afterward.
The full committee mark includes EPA Environmental Programs and Management funds for administrative costs of the brownfields program, and separately provides $85,100,000 to carry out CERCLA section 104(k), including grants, interagency agreements, and associated program support costs.
Roll Call 9, dated June 3, 2026, records the motion to report the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Bill for FY2027, as amended, adopted 35 yeas to 27 nays.
The committee report print describes EPA programs as including Superfund and Brownfields, recommends $3,696,414,000 for State and Tribal Assistance Grants, and summarizes bill language requiring a portion of brownfields grants for persistent poverty communities and territories.
Assessments
Brownfields funding was included in the FY2027 Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies full committee mark before the June 3, 2026 full committee consideration, and the bill was reported from full committee with that funding still in the package. That substantively matches the funding-restoration timing goal. However, the evidence does not show Barragán authored, sponsored, negotiated, or materially advanced the restoration; it mainly shows the committee vehicle contained the funding. Because the outcome occurred but candidate-specific credit is not established, partial credit is appropriate rather than full delivery.
Brownfields funding shows up in the FY27 Interior full committee print, so the restoration objective appears to have been met before full committee consideration. However, the available evidence does not show Barragán's direct authorship or material role in that result, so the safest adjudication is partial credit rather than full delivery.
The promise was specific about restoring Brownfields Program funding before full committee consideration. The evidence shows Brownfields funding continued to be available and that Barragán highlighted a concrete EPA Brownfields grant for Carson in 2024, indicating some success in supporting Brownfields funding. However, there is no direct evidence here that she personally restored program funding in the appropriations process before full committee consideration, which is the core promised action and timing. Because there is evidence of related funding benefits but not clear proof that the specific restoration promise was fully achieved through her action, partial credit is most appropriate.