Provide for consideration of legislation including the Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act, the Sharri Briley and Eric Edmundson Veterans Benefits Expansion Act, and the Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act.

Jason Crow · Colorado · Democratic

policy impact 1.00 specificity 1.00 extraction confidence 93%

Occurrences

Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1041) Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 6047) Sharri Briley and Eric Edmundson Veterans Benefits Expansion Act; and providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1329) Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act

Crow voted on a rule that would allow House consideration of three specified bills.

Votes and Legislation | Representative Jason Crow
primary · other · model gpt-5.4-mini

Evidence

The House rejected the latest Smithsonian American Women's History Museum location bill after Republican amendments on the museum's definition and site control caused Democrats to pull support. The article also notes the museum was authorized in 2020 and that the 2025-26 effort had built broad bipartisan support before collapsing.

The newest related museum bill was blocked in the House on May 22, 2026, showing the current legislative effort did not deliver. The underlying museum project remains real, but the latest push was reversed/blocked.

partial later_term A for effort

How a bipartisan women’s history museum became a political football
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 92%

The Smithsonian's official museum site shows active 2026 programming and an article dated April 7, 2026 about the American Women's History Initiative Pool laying groundwork for a new museum, indicating the project is ongoing rather than abandoned.

The official Smithsonian site confirms the women's history museum project is active and still advancing, consistent with the museum authorization having been delivered and built out further over time.

delivered later_term

Smithsonian American Women's History Museum
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 84%

The House rejected the amended Smithsonian American Women's History Museum bill on a 216-204 vote after Republicans added restrictions on exhibits and site control; the article also notes Congress had already authorized the museum in 2020.

The newest legislative push for the women's history museum was blocked in the House, but the underlying museum had already been authorized, so the broader promise is only partially delivered.

partial later_term A for effort

How a bipartisan women’s history museum became a political football
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 93%

Assessments

partial later_term

The record here supports only partial delivery. The strongest evidence is on the Smithsonian American Women's History Museum: Congress had already authorized the museum in 2020 and the project was still active in 2026, so that portion advanced materially. But the newer 2025-2026 museum bill failed in the House, and the payload does not show full enactment or completed consideration for all of the other listed bills, especially the two veterans measures. Under a federal-office credit standard, Crow can receive some credit for participating in a broader legislative effort that moved part of the agenda forward, but not full credit for complete delivery of the whole package.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 76%

partial same_term A for effort

The Smithsonian American Women's History Museum was authorized in 2020 while Crow was in office, so there is real legislative delivery on part of the cited agenda. But the latest related House push stalled in 2026, and the record here does not verify the two veterans bills or Crow's direct central role, so this is only partial credit rather than full delivery.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 64%