It would require that no demonstration program could result in people's benefits being lower than current law, and no demonstration could be used to deny eligibility to applicants who would be approved for SSDI under current law.
I will require that no Social Security demonstration program reduce benefits below current law or deny SSDI eligibility to applicants who would qualify under current law.
Occurrences
Evidence
Section 823 amended Social Security Act section 234 to authorize an SSDI earnings demonstration project, but the statutory text includes a benefit floor: benefits may not be reduced below $0, and no benefit is payable if the offset fully eliminates it. The law also states no one may be denied eligibility under the demonstration beyond current-law eligibility rules.
CRS explains that SSDI eligibility requires a worker to meet the statutory definition of disability and other current-law requirements. This confirms the baseline against which any demonstration project would be measured and shows that current-law SSDI eligibility remains the operative standard unless changed by statute.
The Congressional Record index for John B. Larson in the 119th Congress shows recent Social Security floor activity in 2026, but the available indexed entries do not identify enactment or a new demonstration-program restriction matching the promise. No concrete legislative adoption is shown in the retrieved material.
Assessments
The underlying policy outcome appears to have been enacted: the 2015 Bipartisan Budget Act's SSDI demonstration language included protections tied to current-law eligibility and prevented benefit reductions below the statutory floor. That matches much of the substance of the promise. However, the provided evidence does not show that John B. Larson personally wrote, sponsored, or materially advanced that enacted provision. More recent evidence shows he remained active on Social Security issues, but not that he delivered this specific restriction in the current term. Because the outcome occurred but candidate-specific credit is not established in the record, partial credit is more appropriate than full delivery.