Amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from gross income for certain wastewater management subsidies.

Aaron Bean · Florida · Republican

policy impact 2.00 specificity 5.00 extraction confidence 99%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

‘To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from gross income for certain wastewater management subsidies.’ ... ‘The SEPTIC Act’ ... ‘wastewater management measure’ means any installation or modification of property primarily designed to manage wastewater (including septic tanks and cesspools) with respect to one or more dwelling units.

This is the introduced bill text matching the claim almost exactly. It shows Aaron Bean as a listed cosponsor/backer of the SEPTIC Act and confirms the requested tax-code exclusion for certain wastewater management subsidies, but the text itself is only an introduction and not evidence of enactment.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Septic-Act.pdf
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

Representatives Greg Steube (R-Fla.), Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.), Aaron Bean (R-Fla.), and Gus Bilirakis (R-Fla.) introduced the SEPTIC Act, legislation to create a uniform federal income-tax exclusion for financial assistance provided to homeowners for septic system replacement.

Official press release confirms Aaron Bean participated in introducing the bill and describes the measure as a federal income-tax exclusion for septic-related assistance. This supports that Bean took concrete legislative action, but it does not show passage or enactment.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Steube, Suozzi Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Exempt Septic Replacement Grants from Federal Income Tax – Congressman Steube
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

U.S. Representatives Greg Steube (R-Fla.), Tom Suozzi (D-N.Y.), Aaron Bean (R-Fla.), and Gus Bilirakis (R-Fla.) introduced the SEPTIC Act, legislation to create a uniform federal income-tax exclusion for financial assistance provided to homeowners for septic system replacement.

Official House press release confirms Bean helped introduce the SEPTIC Act and describes the policy as a federal income-tax exclusion for septic-related assistance. This is concrete legislative effort, but it is not evidence of enactment.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Steube, Suozzi Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Exempt Septic Replacement Grants from Federal Income Tax – Congressman Steube
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an exclusion from gross income for certain wastewater management subsidies. Section 136(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended...by adding...provided...by a State or local government...for the purchase or installation of any wastewater management measure.

The introduced bill text matches the claim directly by proposing an IRC gross-income exclusion for wastewater management subsidies. The text is a proposed amendment and says the amendments apply after enactment, so it does not show the promise was fulfilled.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Septic-Act.pdf
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

Text contains those laws in effect on June 23, 2026. Gross income shall not include the value of any subsidy provided...by a public utility to a customer for the purchase or installation of any energy conservation measure.

The official U.S. Code text for IRC section 136, current through laws in effect on June 23, 2026, contains only the existing energy-conservation subsidy exclusion and not the proposed wastewater-management subsidy exclusion. This supports that enactment had not yet occurred by that date, while the bill could still be pending as of July 1, 2026.

unresolved same_term

26 USC 136: Energy conservation subsidies provided by public utilities
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

never same_term A for effort

Aaron Bean materially advanced the promised policy by helping introduce the SEPTIC Act, whose text directly amends the Internal Revenue Code to exclude certain wastewater management subsidies from gross income. However, the evidence shows only introduction/proposed bill text, and the current IRC section 136 text in effect as of June 23, 2026 did not include the wastewater-management exclusion. Because the promised statutory amendment had not been enacted by the adjudication date, this is not delivered, but it earns an effort badge for a serious legislative attempt during the same federal term.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

unresolved unknown

Aaron Bean materially advanced the promise by co-introducing the SEPTIC Act in April 2026, and the bill text matches the claimed policy almost exactly by proposing a federal gross-income exclusion for certain wastewater-management subsidies. But the available evidence shows introduction only, not enactment or an actual amendment to the Internal Revenue Code. Because Bean is still in office and the measure appears pending rather than definitively failed, this is not full delivery and not yet a final failure.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 90%

unresolved same_term A for effort

Aaron Bean participated in introducing the SEPTIC Act, which matches the claimed Internal Revenue Code exclusion for certain wastewater management subsidies. That is a concrete legislative effort in his current term, but the evidence does not show the measure was enacted, so the promise cannot be marked fulfilled.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 97%

unresolved same_term A for effort

The evidence shows Aaron Bean took concrete action in the current term by joining the introduction of the SEPTIC Act, whose text matches the promise to amend the Internal Revenue Code to exclude certain wastewater management subsidies from gross income. However, the provided record shows only introduction of the bill and no passage, enactment, or other completed policy change. Because there is clear legislative effort but no evidence yet of success or failure, the best judgment is unresolved rather than delivered or never.

provider openai · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 96%