Parents would have the right to pursue legal action against schools that violate these provisions.
I will support legislation giving parents the right to take legal action against schools that violate parental transparency provisions.
Occurrences
Evidence
The campaign site's Recent News page shows the newest items I could find were dated January 30, 2026 and focused on credit-card interest and congressional stock trading; I found no school-transparency or parental-rights litigation update in the 30-day lookback window.
A May 20, 2026 report says the House passed the Stopping Indoctrination and Protecting Kids Act, which would require elementary and middle schools to get parental approval before changing a student's pronouns, gender identification, or sex-based accommodations and would tie federal funding to compliance.
Congress.gov lists Rep. Luna, Anna Paulina [R-FL-13] as an original cosponsor of H.R.5, the Parents Bill of Rights Act, on 03/01/2023.
The Clerk records Roll Call 161 on H.R.5, Parents Bill of Rights Act: Vote Question: On Passage; Status: Passed; Aye: 213, No: 208. Luna, Republican, Florida, voted Aye.
Congress.gov reports H.R.5 was introduced by Rep. Julia Letlow, passed the House on 03/24/2023 by recorded vote 213-208, and was received in the Senate and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions on 03/27/2023.
H.R.5 text requires schools receiving federal funds to obtain parental consent before changing a minor child's gender markers, pronouns, preferred name on school forms, or sex-based accommodations. Its enforcement language refers to the Secretary reporting enforcement actions to Congress.
The Supreme Court held that FERPA's relevant provisions create no personal rights enforceable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the syllabus also notes FERPA does not give rise to a private cause of action.
The report says the House passed the Stopping Indoctrination and Protecting Kids Act, also known as the PROTECT Kids Act, 217-198, requiring elementary and middle schools to obtain parental approval before changes to pronouns, gender identification, or sex-based accommodations, with federal funding conditioned on compliance.
Assessments
Luna took concrete same-term action on related parental-transparency legislation by originally cosponsoring H.R.5 and voting for its House passage. But the evidence shows H.R.5 stalled in the Senate and, more importantly, relied on federal administrative/funding enforcement rather than creating an express private right for parents to sue schools. Later related House action in 2026 likewise appears to condition federal funds and is not shown to have delivered the promised legal-action remedy or to have been materially advanced by Luna. This is a serious but unsuccessful legislative effort, not fulfillment of the specific promise.
The promise was to support legislation specifically allowing parents to sue schools that violate parental-transparency rules. The provided evidence shows related House action on school gender-policy transparency in May 2026, but it does not show that Anna Paulina Luna wrote, sponsored, voted for, or materially advanced a measure with the promised legal-action remedy. The campaign evidence likewise shows no direct update tying her to this promise. On this record, there is not enough evidence to credit delivery, partial delivery, or a serious failed attempt.