Wasserman Schultz is the lead sponsor of legislation that would prohibit the use of federal funds to construct, reimburse, or operate any detention facility in the Everglades. The No Cages in the Everglades Act would also permanently codify the appropriations provision barring any Administration from preventing Members of Congress or their staff from conducting oversight visits at detention facilities, with no exceptions for facilities operated by State or local governments or by private contractors.
I will continue to push for legislation that prohibits the use of federal funds to construct, reimburse, or operate any detention facility in the Everglades and codifies protections for congressional oversight visits to detention facilities.
Occurrences
"That is part of the oversight responsibilities that I have. It is required, and they are prohibited from expending any funds that block a member's ability to get access to the facility or to get information necessary to conduct that oversight."
Evidence
unverified · Source version 17600 · locator unknown
In her May 12, 2026 House statement, Wasserman Schultz said the Everglades camp’s closure was "long overdue," said she had fought it "at every turn, in Congress, in court," and added, "But this fight isn't done" and Democrats would "keep fighting for reforms."
unverified · Source version 66455 · locator unknown
“introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary”
unverified · Source version 53617 · locator unknown
“no funds made available to the Department of Homeland Security, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, may be obligated or expended”
unverified · Source version 53619 · locator unknown
“Explicitly affirm Members of Congress’ right to inspect any facility holding federal immigration detainees”
unverified · Source version 53621 · locator unknown
“Current status In Committee”
unverified · Source version 53623 · locator unknown
“While the detention center is closed for now, neither state nor federal officials have shown that the closure is permanent.”
unverified · Source version 53625 · locator unknown
“Status as of August 29, 2026: The federal environmental lawsuit over ‘Alligator Alcatraz’ is still active in court”
verified · Source version 66450 · locator 3688
She also introduced the No Cages in the Everglades Act with fellow Florida Democrats to defund the Everglades internment camp, launch an independent investigation of any laws broken in its construction and operation, and ensure more robust Congressional oversight there and in all similar facilities.
verified · Source version 66449 · locator 2151
Shortly after our initial visit, we introduced the No Cages in the Everglades Act to prohibit the use of Federal funds for this appalling project or any other detention facility in the Everglades, require an independent investigation of State and federal laws violated in its construction and management, and permanently codify the rights of Members of Congress to conduct unannounced oversight visits wherever immigrants are detained.
verified · Source version 66449 · locator 1514
During these visits, Members in our delegation were repeatedly denied access to view these punishment cages, and told by DHS and FDEM employees and contractors that detainee reports of their existence and use for punitive or coercive purposes were categorically false.
verified · Source version 66455 · locator 1204
Last Action Date Listed July 17, 2025
verified · Source version 53617 · locator 1441
no funds made available to the Department of Homeland Security, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, may be obligated or expended
verified · Source version 53617 · locator 2293
shall allow Members of Congress and designated congressional staff to conduct announced or unannounced inspections of such facility at any time
Assessments
The evidence shows Wasserman Schultz was still actively pressing the Everglades detention issue in a May 12, 2026 House statement and said the fight was not done, but it does not show that the requested legislation was enacted or that congressional-oversight protections were codified. That supports an ongoing, unresolved promise rather than a fulfilled one.