Push for increased funding for the CRISI Program and Railroad Crossing Elimination grant programs.

Frederica S. Wilson · Florida · Democratic

spending impact 3.00 specificity 1.00 extraction confidence 97%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

Wilson’s transportation page says she supports rail safety as rail expands nationwide and notes she has pushed for nearly $500 million in Miami infrastructure funds.

This shows ongoing rail and transportation advocacy, but it does not mention CRISI or Railroad Crossing Elimination funding specifically.

unresolved same_term

Transportation | Congresswoman Frederica Wilson
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 62%

Contest this evidence item

Her most recent transportation-related release in the lookback window is a May 22 rail-safety statement tied to a Miami incident.

Recent rail-related attention is present, but the release is about safety and condolences rather than a funding push for the two grant programs named in the claim.

unresolved same_term

Press Releases | Congresswoman Frederica Wilson
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 67%

Contest this evidence item

The FY27 appropriations page lists district projects submitted to Appropriations, with visible entries focused on schools, parks, fire services, food, and other local projects.

The posted request list does not visibly surface any CRISI or Railroad Crossing Elimination request, so claim-specific funding activity is not apparent there.

unresolved same_term

FY 27 Appropriations Requests | Congresswoman Frederica Wilson
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 58%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

unresolved unknown

The available evidence shows Wilson has engaged on rail safety and general transportation issues, but it does not show that she specifically pushed for increased funding for the CRISI Program or the Railroad Crossing Elimination grant program. Her transportation page and recent press materials do not mention those programs, and the visible FY27 appropriations request list does not clearly identify them either. Because the record here does not establish either concrete claim-specific action or a delivered outcome, the promise is best judged unresolved rather than delivered, partial, or never.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 78%