House Democrats Press Trump Administration Over Withholding Foreign Assistance Funds and Defying Congressional Intent
Continue opposing the withholding of appropriated foreign assistance funds and demand that the administration spend taxpayer dollars as directed by Congress.
Occurrences
we write with deep concern regarding the Administration’s plan to withhold $19 billion for the closeout of terminated foreign assistance awards
Lasting national security is about more than bombs, bullying, or tariffs. It demands smart diplomacy, strong development, and lifesaving humanitarian aid that prevent threats from developing before they ever reach our shores. This funding bill fails that test. I look forward to coming together to deliver a bill that reflects the very best of American leadership and truly protects the American people.
House Democrats Press Trump Administration Over Withholding Foreign Assistance Funds and Defying Congressional Intent
She is also committed to bolstering U.S. diplomacy and securing funding that advances U.S. national security, economic interests, and global stability. Through her role in the Committee, the Congresswoman is also committed to fighting back against the Trump Administration’s efforts to eliminate and tamper with congressionally-appropriated funding that has already been signed into law.
Evidence
Frankel, as Ranking Member of the House Appropriations NSRP subcommittee, joined colleagues in sending a letter to OMB and USAID officials over plans to withhold $19 billion in foreign assistance and the administration's refusal to spend taxpayer dollars as directed by Congress.
Frankel led Democratic opposition to the FY2027 national security and State appropriations bill, arguing it cut humanitarian aid, global health, and other assistance needed for U.S. leadership and oversight of foreign assistance.
Assessments
Frankel, while serving in office, joined a formal letter to OMB and USAID opposing the withholding of appropriated foreign assistance funds and criticized the administration for refusing to spend taxpayer dollars as directed by Congress. That is direct evidence that she continued the promised opposition and demand during the same term; there is no evidence needed here of the funds later being released because the claim is about the oversight action itself.