Do not support funding ICE until the Trump Administration implements basic, commonsense reforms, including requiring agents to be identifiable, protecting local law enforcement resources from being diverted to ICE operations, and requiring judicial warrants before agents can enter people's homes.

Lois Frankel · Florida · Democratic

policy impact 3.00 specificity 1.00 extraction confidence 98%

Occurrences

I will not support funding ICE until the Trump Administration implements basic, commonsense reforms—including requiring agents to be identifiable, protecting local law enforcement resources from being diverted to ICE operations, and requiring judicial warrants before agents can enter people’s homes.

Frankel commits to withhold support for ICE funding unless specified ICE accountability and warrant reforms are adopted.

Frankel: No More Funding for ICE Without Commonsense Reforms | U.S. Representative Lois Frankel
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.4-mini

Evidence

The House passed a $70 billion immigration-enforcement package by a 214-212 vote, and the compromises Democrats had sought for the DHS/ICE fight, including judicial-warrant requirements and body-camera guardrails, were not adopted before passage and signing.

This is indirect evidence that the latest funding fight ended without the reforms named in the pledge. It does not give Frankel's individual roll-call vote, so it only supports an unresolved status rather than a direct personal confirmation.

unresolved same_term

Trump signs bill giving nearly $70B to his immigration enforcement agenda through end of his term
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 34%

Assessments

delivered same_term

The promise was about Frankel's own support for ICE funding, not about forcing the reforms into law. By June 9-10, 2026, Congress passed and Trump signed a nearly $70 billion immigration-enforcement package without the named guardrails such as judicial-warrant requirements and identification/body-camera rules. Reporting on that vote said House Democrats unanimously opposed the bill after months of pressing those reforms, and Democrats had also backed an earlier reopening measure that excluded ICE and CBP funding. In federal-office context, that is strong evidence Frankel did not support ICE funding absent the promised reforms, even though Republicans enacted the funding anyway.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 78%