Support conditions on the appointment of court monitors.

Andrew S. Clyde · Georgia · Republican

oversight impact 1.00 specificity 1.00 extraction confidence 91%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Occurrences

H.R. 8365 On Passage of the Bill Aye Monitor Accountability Act

Voted for the Monitor Accountability Act, which provides conditions on the appointment of monitors by courts.

Vote Record | U.S. Representative Andrew S. Clyde
primary · other · model gpt-5.4-mini

I've introduced the Monitor Accountability Act... [which] would require federal district courts to follow common-sense rules when appointing monitors to oversee state or local government agencies.

The candidate commits to the Monitor Accountability Act, which imposes rules and limits on court monitor appointments.

U.S. House Passes Congressman Biggs's Monitor Accountability Act | Congressman Andy Biggs
primary · other · model gpt-5.4-mini

Evidence

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

SEC. 2. CONDITIONS ON THE APPOINTMENT OF MONITORS BY COURTS. ... The Administrator ... shall by rule establish conditions on the appointment by a district court ... of any person charged ... with monitoring the conduct of a State or unit of local government. Such conditions shall include ... public comment ... term greater than 5 years ... annual accounting ... publication ...

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Official bill text shows the exact policy claimed: it would impose conditions on court-appointed monitors, including notice/public comment, limits on term and fees, and reporting requirements. This is strong evidence of support for the claim.

delivered same_term A for effort

maa-ans.pdf
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 98%

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Markup of ... H.R. 8365, the Monitor Accountability Act of 2026 ... Amendment in the Nature of a Substitute to H.R. 8365, the Monitor Accountability Act of 2026 - adopted by voice vote

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Official committee markup record confirms the monitor-conditions bill advanced in committee during the lookback window, showing active pursuit of the policy and committee-level progress.

partial same_term A for effort

H.R. 8352, the Criminal History Access Act; H.R. 8365, the Monitor Accountability Act of 2026; and Ratification of Subcommittee Assignments | Committee Repository | U.S. House of Representatives
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 93%

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Today, in a bipartisan vote, the U.S. House passed the Monitor Accountability Act ... If enacted into law, the Monitor Accountability Act would require federal district courts to follow common-sense rules when appointing monitors ... Public input: Courts must announce the proposed monitor and allow public comment before appointment.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This official House-member release states the House passed the measure and summarizes the condition-on-appointment provisions, indicating substantial legislative delivery. Because it is a member release rather than the clerk’s roll-call page, it is supportive but slightly less authoritative than the underlying chamber record.

delivered same_term A for effort

U.S. House Passes Congressman Biggs's Monitor Accountability Act | Congressman Andy Biggs
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 87%

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

119th Congress, 2nd Session (2026) ... Roll Call votes list the House’s action for May 14, 2026, including passage of the relevant measure in the chamber vote sequence for that date.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The Clerk’s roll-call record is the best official source to verify chamber action, corroborating that the House voted on and passed legislation in the monitor-accountability area during the lookback period.

delivered same_term A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 91%

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Roll Call 173, H.R. 8365, Monitor Accountability Act: Vote Question On Passage; Status Passed; Aye 219, No 204. The vote list records Clyde, Republican, GA, voting Aye.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Official House roll-call data directly confirms Andrew Clyde supported the Monitor Accountability Act on final House passage in the same congressional term.

partial same_term A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives - Roll Call 173
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

H.R. 8365 (RFS), Monitor Accountability Act. Last Action Date Listed: May 18, 2026. Action: Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. Full Title: An Act To provide for conditions on the appointment of monitors by courts, and for other purposes.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The latest official bill version shows the House-passed bill was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee, with no evidence of enactment or implementation found in the August 29-31, 2026 lookback search window.

unresolved same_term A for effort

GovInfo - H.R. 8365 (RFS), Monitor Accountability Act
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): delivered. same_term A for effort

Clyde fulfilled the support promise in his federal House role by voting Aye on H.R. 8365, the Monitor Accountability Act, which contained conditions on court-appointed monitors and passed the House on May 14, 2026. The measure had not become law by the provided evidence window, but the claim was framed as supporting conditions, not securing final enactment, so House passage support is enough for delivery credit.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 91%

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): partial. same_term A for effort

The evidence shows clear support and meaningful advancement of the promise. The bill text directly contains conditions on the appointment of court monitors, and committee markup plus a recorded House vote confirm the measure advanced and passed the House in the same term. However, the record provided does not show enactment into law or full federal implementation, and the press release itself says 'If enacted into law,' indicating the outcome was not yet complete. Because the promise was to support such conditions rather than necessarily guarantee final enactment, Clyde appears to have materially supported the policy, but the evidence does not establish full delivery beyond House passage. That supports partial credit rather than delivered.

provider openai · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 91%