We urge you to evaluate trade actions that can safeguard U.S. growers from unfair pressures from Mexico.
Urge the U.S. Trade Representative to evaluate trade actions that safeguard U.S. specialty crop growers from unfair pressure from Mexico as part of the USMCA review.
Occurrences
led a bipartisan group of 79 members of the U.S. House of Representatives in sending a letter to United States Trade Representative (USTR) Ambassador Jamieson Greer to emphasize the importance of fair-trade measures for the U.S. specialty crop industry
This legislation modernizes trade and global food assistance...
Evidence
The letter calls for improved trade measures, as part of the 2026 United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) review process, that protect the long-term viability of America’s fruit, vegetable, and certain tree nut industries... 'We urge you to evaluate trade actions that can safeguard U.S. growers from unfair pressures from Mexico.'
'We urge you to evaluate trade actions that can safeguard U.S. growers from unfair pressures from Mexico.' The letter references the 2026 USMCA review process and asks USTR to consider measures that protect specialty crop producers.
USTR announced bilateral negotiating rounds for the first Joint Review of USMCA; the second round in Washington, D.C. 'will also include discussions on agriculture and a level playing field.'
USTR and Mexico 'agreed to hold a first official bilateral negotiating round for the USMCA Review the week of May 25, 2026 in Mexico City.'
Assessments
Scott appears to have fulfilled the advocacy part of the promise by publicly leading and sending a bipartisan House letter to the U.S. Trade Representative on May 12, 2026 explicitly urging evaluation of trade actions to protect U.S. specialty crop growers from unfair pressure from Mexico during the USMCA review. However, the evidence does not show that USTR actually adopted his requested safeguards or took a specific responsive action because of his urging. The later USTR announcements confirm the USMCA review and related agricultural discussions were underway, but they do not verify delivery of the requested policy outcome. So this is best scored as partial credit for making the formal push, not full delivery of the substantive result.