Once the code is law, it seems only reasonable that Americans should be able to figure out what the law says. On the other hand, SDOs fund their work, which we rely on to keep us safe, through sale of their copyrighted works, and we also have an interest in ensuring these codes always reflect the highest possible standards. ... So, if we want to ensure that SDOs retain their copyright, legislation is likely necessary. The question is, what kind of legislation?
Support legislation to ensure Americans can access laws and standards incorporated by reference while preserving appropriate copyright protections for standards-developing organizations.
Occurrences
Evidence
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The Clerk recorded Roll Call 357 on H.R. 1631, the Pro Codes Act. The motion failed, 248 yeas to 127 nays; Johnson (GA) voted Yea.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Johnson said Americans have a reasonable interest in access to governing laws, that legislation is likely necessary to retain SDO copyright, and that he voted for the Pro Codes Act last Congress.
Assessments
The promise was framed as supporting legislation, not guaranteeing enactment. Johnson took concrete federal legislative action by voting Yea on H.R. 1631, the Pro Codes Act, which matched the pledge by combining free public online access to incorporated standards with continued copyright protection for standards-developing organizations. He also continued to advance the issue in the 119th Congress as ranking member through an April 21, 2026 hearing statement. The bill has not become law, but enactment was not the stated promise, so his support counts as delivered.