Will oppose the politicized version of H.R. 1329 on the House floor unless Republicans restore the bipartisan version and retain the museum's spirit.

Nancy Pelosi · California · Democratic

policy impact 0.62 specificity 0.89 extraction confidence 98%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Our support for this bill is contingent on the retention of the museum’s spirit and the bill’s bipartisan foundation. Absent those conditions, we will be compelled to oppose the politicized version of H.R. 1329 on the House floor.

House Democrats, including Pelosi, commit to opposing the amended H.R. 1329 unless it is restored to the bipartisan version and keeps the museum's original spirit.

4.16.26museumsletter.pdf
secondary · other · model gpt-5.4-mini

Evidence

GovInfo lists H.R. 1329 (RH) as reported in the House, with last action date April 23, 2026.

The bill advanced procedurally in the House by April 23, but this is not a floor vote or final disposition.

unresolved unknown

H.R. 1329 (RH) - Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act - BILLS-119hr1329rh | Content Details | GovInfo
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

The letter says members would oppose the amended H.R. 1329 on the House floor unless Republicans restore the original bipartisan version and pair it with H.R. 1330.

Pelosi joined a concrete, official lobbying action that restates the conditional opposition pledge; it shows the promise was being actively maintained, not yet resolved.

unresolved unknown A for effort

4.16.26museumsletter.pdf
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

The Rules Committee meeting package for May 19, 2026 includes H.R. 1329, the Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act, and H. Res. 1300 providing for consideration of H.R. 1329 on the House floor.

By the end of the lookback window, H.R. 1329 had cleared the Rules Committee stage and was moving toward floor consideration, but this source does not show a floor vote or final House disposition.

unresolved same_term A for effort

H.R. 1041 – Veterans 2nd Amendment Protection Act; H.R. 6047 – Sharri Briley and Eric Edmundson Veterans Benefits Expansion Act of 2026; H.R. 1329 – Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act | Committee Repository | U.S. House of Representatives
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

The Rules Committee chair stated that the committee was convening to consider H.R. 1329 and described it as legislation to designate land on the Reserve of the National Mall for the Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum.

This confirms the bill remained active in committee on May 19, but it does not show that Pelosi’s conditional opposition had been tested on the House floor or that the underlying dispute had been resolved.

unresolved same_term

Foxx Opening Remarks on H.R. 1041, H.R. 6047, and H.R. 1329 | House of Representatives Committee on Rules
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

The House floor proceedings for May 20, 2026 show debate and votes on H. Res. 1300, which provides for consideration of H.R. 1329, but the entry does not show a House floor vote on H.R. 1329 itself.

As of the latest available House floor record in the window, the bill had not yet reached a final floor vote, so Pelosi’s promised floor opposition had not yet been triggered or completed.

unresolved same_term

Office of the Clerk | U.S. House of Representatives
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

May 21, 2026 roll call 187 for H.R. 1329 shows the House vote was “On Motion to Recommit” and that motion failed; the page separately lists a later roll call 188 for H.R. 1329 on passage, indicating the bill did reach the floor and was not merely pending in committee.

This is the key update in the lookback window: H.R. 1329 reached the House floor and moved beyond consideration. The failed recommit vote and subsequent passage vote mean Pelosi’s promised floor opposition was actually tested, but the promise’s conditional language still leaves the underlying outcome unresolved without evidence that Republicans restored the bipartisan version and retained the museum's spirit.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

The roll-call index for May 21, 2026 lists H.R. 1329 Roll Call 188 as “On Passage” and Roll Call 187 as “On Motion to Recommit,” both on the Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act.

This confirms that H.R. 1329 received a final House passage vote on May 21, 2026, after the earlier procedural recommit vote. It establishes that the promised House-floor moment occurred, but the available record here does not show that the bill was restored to the bipartisan version Pelosi demanded, so the promise is not clearly satisfied on its own terms.

unresolved same_term

U.S. House of Representatives Roll Call Votes
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

The Rules Committee stated on May 19, 2026 that it was convening to consider H.R. 1329, the Smithsonian American Women’s History Museum Act, for House floor consideration.

This shows the bill was actively moving toward the floor immediately before the House votes. It supports the conclusion that Pelosi’s conditional floor opposition was not hypothetical or abandoned before the floor action occurred.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Foxx Opening Remarks on H.R. 1041, H.R. 6047, and H.R. 1329 | House of Representatives Committee on Rules
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

The House roll-call index for May 21, 2026 lists H.R. 1329 roll call 188 as 'On Passage' with result 'F' for failed, and roll call 187 as the motion to recommit on the same bill.

This is the final House-floor action on H.R. 1329: the politicized version reached the floor and failed. Because the record shows no restoration of the bipartisan version before that vote, Pelosi's conditional pledge to oppose the politicized bill was carried out.

delivered same_term A for effort

U.S. House of Representatives Roll Call Votes
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

delivered same_term A for effort

Pelosi’s promise was conditional: she said she would oppose H.R. 1329 on the House floor unless Republicans restored the bipartisan version and preserved the museum’s original spirit. The record shows H.R. 1329 did reach the House floor on May 21, 2026, and there is no evidence in the provided record that Republicans restored the bipartisan version before final action. Pelosi had already materially advanced that opposition stance by joining the April 16, 2026 letter restating it, so when the politicized version came to the floor, the best reading is that she followed through on the promised opposition during the same term.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 88%

unresolved same_term A for effort

Pelosi clearly helped advance the opposition effort through the April 16 letter and the House later took up H.R. 1329 on May 21, 2026, but the record provided does not show that Republicans restored the bipartisan version or that the specific House-floor opposition promise was fully satisfied. Because the claim is conditional and the available evidence does not confirm the condition or the final outcome on her own terms, this remains unresolved rather than delivered.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 89%

unresolved same_term A for effort

The promise was conditional: Pelosi said she would oppose H.R. 1329 on the House floor unless Republicans restored the bipartisan version and preserved the museum's spirit. Evidence shows the bill did reach the House floor in May 2026 and received both a motion-to-recommit vote and a final passage vote, so the promised decision point occurred during the same term. However, the record provided does not show whether Republicans restored the bipartisan version, whether Pelosi in fact voted against final passage, or whether the condition was satisfied in some other way. There is evidence she actively maintained the opposition stance through an April 2026 letter, so serious effort is documented, but the available evidence does not establish fulfillment or failure of the promise on its own terms.

provider openai · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 95%

unresolved same_term A for effort

The promise was conditional on House floor action on H.R. 1329: Pelosi pledged to oppose the politicized version unless Republicans restored the bipartisan version and retained the museum's spirit. The evidence shows Pelosi materially joined an official April 16, 2026 opposition letter and that H.R. 1329 moved through Rules Committee and toward floor consideration in May 2026, but it does not show a final House floor vote on H.R. 1329 or that the bipartisan version was restored. Because the triggering floor vote/outcome had not yet occurred in the provided record, fulfillment cannot be determined yet. The effort badge is warranted because Pelosi took a concrete public legislative position to advance the promised opposition.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%