Provide robust funding for trade capacity building assistance to implement the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).

Jonathan L. Jackson · Illinois · Democratic

spending impact 2.00 specificity 1.00 extraction confidence 96%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

it is vital to provide robust funding for trade capacity building assistance to implement the landmark African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).

Jackson advocates robust trade capacity building funding to help implement AfCFTA.

HHRG-119-AP04-Wstate-J000309-20260325.pdf
primary · speech · model gpt-5.4-mini

Evidence

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Mrs. Cherfilus-McCormick (for herself and Mr. Jackson of Illinois) introduced the bill. Section 6 would require USAID to establish an AfCFTA Trade Capacity Building Program and authorize $50,000,000 for each fiscal year 2025 through 2034.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Jackson co-introduced a concrete bill matching the promise: a dedicated AfCFTA trade-capacity program with $50 million annually authorized for ten years. Because this was only introduced bill text, it shows effort rather than enacted delivery.

never same_term A for effort

H.R.8249 - U.S.-Africa Strategic Trade and Investment Partnership Act of 2024, Introduced in House
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

Congress.gov lists H.R.8249 with the status Introduced and latest action: House - 12/17/2024 Referred to the Subcommittee on Trade.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The dedicated AfCFTA funding bill did not pass the House, Senate, or become law in the 118th Congress, so the promised funding was not delivered through this vehicle.

never same_term A for effort

H.R.8249 - ASTIP Act of 2024, Bill Overview
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

CRS reported that U.S. AfCFTA support generally took the form of ad hoc workshops, trainings, and dialogue events, and that there appeared to be no comprehensive data source tracking funding specifically for AfCFTA implementation.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Before Jackson's bill, official CRS analysis found targeted U.S. AfCFTA assistance existed, but not a robust, dedicated, trackable funding stream specific to AfCFTA implementation.

never unknown

CRS: African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA): Overview and Issues for Congress
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 87%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

CRS stated that USAID's TCB database does not break out AfCFTA-specific funding, and that trade integration funding, the category most akin to AfCFTA support, averaged $2.6 million annually from 2011 to 2020, less than 1% of total U.S. TCB funding to Africa.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): This supports a non-delivery assessment: existing U.S. trade-capacity funding was broad and relatively small in the category closest to AfCFTA implementation, not the robust dedicated funding promised.

never unknown

CRS: African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA): Overview and Issues for Congress
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

USTR reported that in 2024 the U.S. Government and AfCFTA Secretariat continued implementing the 2022 MOU and engaged in technical meetings throughout 2024.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The executive branch continued AfCFTA engagement during Jackson's term, but the report describes MOU implementation and technical meetings rather than a new robust congressional funding program for AfCFTA trade capacity building.

partial same_term

2025 Trade Policy Agenda and 2024 Annual Report of the President of the United States on the Trade Agreements Program
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 82%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The FY2026 final explanatory statement includes $6,766,874,000 for National Security Investment Programs, says Africa-directed funds should focus on sub-Saharan Africa, and lists a global-program line for Trade capacity building at $15,000,000. It contains no AfCFTA or African Continental Free Trade Area line item.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The enacted FY2026 funding materials show only broad trade-capacity funding, not robust dedicated assistance to implement AfCFTA. This reinforces non-delivery, with no new Jackson-specific action.

never later_term

FY26 SFOPS Joint Explanatory Statement
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown

The FY2027 House Appropriations report supports trade capacity building programs that advance U.S. interests in the Western Hemisphere and Africa, including AGOA goals by increasing intra-continental trade, and requires a FY2027 spend plan. It does not name AfCFTA or create dedicated AfCFTA implementation funding.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The latest FY2027 House appropriations report shows some Africa-related trade-capacity language, but it is broad AGOA/intra-African trade language and not robust AfCFTA-specific funding. Because the bill was not enacted as of the refresh, delivery remains unresolved/non-delivered.

partial later_term

H. Rept. 119-631 - National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Bill, 2027
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 86%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): never. same_term A for effort

Jackson co-introduced H.R.8249, which directly matched the promise by proposing a USAID AfCFTA Trade Capacity Building Program with $50 million annually for FY2025-FY2034. But the bill only reached referral to the Trade Subcommittee and did not become law. Enacted FY2026 materials and FY2027 House report language show only broad trade-capacity or Africa/AGOA-related funding, not robust dedicated AfCFTA implementation funding. Existing executive engagement and technical meetings are insufficient to count as delivery of the promised funding outcome.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 91%

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): never. same_term A for effort

Jackson co-introduced H.R.8249, the ASTIP Act of 2024, which closely matched the promise by proposing a USAID AfCFTA Trade Capacity Building Program and authorizing $50 million annually for FY2025-FY2034. But the bill was only introduced and referred to committee; it did not become law or produce appropriated funding. The USTR and CRS evidence shows ongoing AfCFTA technical engagement and ad hoc assistance, not the robust dedicated funding promised. This was a serious same-term legislative attempt, but the outcome was not delivered.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 91%