Representatives Derek Schmidt (KS-02) and Harriet Hageman (WY-AL) today introduced the Wrongful Injunction Accountability Act.
Introduce legislation to protect taxpayers from unlawful injunctions against the federal government.
Occurrences
Evidence
Schmidt joined House leadership to highlight the No Rogue Rulings Act (H.R. 1526), saying nationwide injunctions are being abused and that Congress should step in to restore balance.
Congress.gov lists H.R.1526, the NORRA of 2025, with Rep. Darrell Issa as sponsor, introduced 02/24/2025, latest action in the Senate on 04/10/2025, and status Passed House. CRS summary says the bill limits federal district courts' authority to issue injunctions and confines injunctions to the parties in the case.
Congress.gov cosponsor data lists Rep. Schmidt, Derek [R-KS-2] as a cosponsor of H.R.1526 on 03/21/2025. The page marks only Van Orden and Weber as original cosponsors; Schmidt is not marked original.
The introduced bill text says H.R.1526 was introduced by Mr. Issa for himself, Mr. Van Orden, and Mr. Weber of Texas. The bill would amend title 28 to limit district court injunctive relief to relief involving the parties before that district court.
The House Clerk records Roll Call 98 on H.R.1526, No Rogue Rulings Act, as passed on 04/09/2025 by 219 yeas to 213 nays. The individual vote list records Schmidt, Republican, Kansas, as Yea.
Schmidt's official House release says he joined House GOP leadership to highlight H.R.1526, the No Rogue Rulings Act. Schmidt said nationwide injunctions were being abused and that Congress should step in to restore balance.
Assessments
Schmidt took concrete same-term action on legislation matching the promise: he cosponsored H.R.1526, publicly promoted it, and voted for House passage. However, the official bill record identifies Rep. Darrell Issa as the sponsor and does not show Schmidt introducing the legislation or being an original cosponsor. Because the promised action was specifically to introduce legislation, Schmidt's support and cosponsorship materially advanced the effort but do not fully satisfy the promise.
Schmidt publicly supported and helped highlight anti-injunction legislation (H.R. 1526 / the No Rogue Rulings Act), which is closely related to the promise, but the evidence does not show that he personally introduced the bill. That makes this a partial fulfillment rather than full delivery.