Welcome Republicans into a bipartisan coalition to pass a War Powers Resolution to end the conflict in Iran.

Jamie Raskin · Maryland · Democratic

policy impact 3.00 specificity 1.00 extraction confidence 93%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

When my Republican colleagues are ready to bring down these exorbitant, Trump-induced fuel costs for our people, I’d welcome them into our bipartisan coalition working to pass a War Powers Resolution to end this lawless and extraordinarily costly conflict in Iran.

Raskin says he would welcome Republicans into a bipartisan coalition to pass a War Powers Resolution ending the Iran conflict.

Raskin Statement on H.R. 1346 | Press Releases | Congressman Jamie Raskin
primary · official_post · model gpt-5.4-mini

Evidence

The House floor debate on H. Con. Res. 38 included the resolution text directing the President to terminate unauthorized hostilities against Iran and statements that Congress had not declared war or authorized use of force. The House then proceeded toward a recorded vote on the resolution.

Confirms Jamie Raskin’s bipartisan War Powers effort was actively on the floor in March 2026, but does not show passage. This is concrete legislative action, though the campaign promise itself remained unresolved in the lookback window.

unresolved same_term A for effort

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE (March 4, 2026)
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

A member stated on the House floor: 'I voted today for the War Powers Resolution, the Khanna resolution.' The page confirms House consideration of the Iran War Powers Resolution on March 5, 2026.

Shows the bipartisan Iran War Powers vote happened in the House, but the cited record does not establish that the resolution became law or ended the conflict.

partial same_term A for effort

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE (March 5, 2026)
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

Raskin said Speaker Johnson should 'bring the House back into session immediately so that we can vote on Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna’s bipartisan War Powers Resolution' and called for constitutional patriots on both sides to come together.

Direct evidence that Raskin publicly urged bipartisan support for a War Powers Resolution on Iran and framed it as a cross-party coalition effort. It supports serious effort, not delivery.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Raskin Statement on Trump’s Unconstitutional Military Strike on Iran
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

House Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar said he voted for 'the bipartisan War Powers Resolution to restrict the Trump Administration from taking further military action in Iran without Congressional approval.'

Confirms bipartisan support existed within House Democrats for the Iran War Powers Resolution. It does not show that the resolution was enacted or that Republicans broadly joined the coalition.

partial same_term A for effort

Statement from Chairman Aguilar on the Bipartisan Iran War Powers Resolution | House Democrats
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

GovInfo shows H. Con. Res. 75 was introduced in the House on March 4, 2026, titled 'Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove the United States Armed Forces from hostilities against the Islamic Republic of Iran.'

Confirms the legislative vehicle for the Iran War Powers push was formally introduced in the same Congress and term. No enactment is shown here.

unresolved same_term A for effort

GovInfo Bill Details: H. Con. Res. 75
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 91%

Contest this evidence item

Raskin referred to 'an unconstitutional war and several failed War Powers Act Resolutions,' indicating the effort had not succeeded by mid-May 2026.

This is the clearest recent signal in the lookback window that the War Powers campaign had not delivered its intended outcome by mid-May 2026.

never same_term

Raskin Delivers Commencement Address at American University's Washington College of Law | Press Releases | Congressman Jamie Raskin
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

H. Con. Res. 38 was introduced by Rep. Thomas Massie with Rep. Ro Khanna and other cosponsors. The text directed the President to terminate use of U.S. Armed Forces in hostilities against Iran unless Congress authorized war or force.

Official bill text confirms a concrete bipartisan House War Powers vehicle existed to remove U.S. forces from Iran hostilities, but this introduced version does not show passage or an end to the conflict.

partial same_term A for effort

H. Con. Res. 38 Introduced in House - Directing the President pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove United States Armed Forces from unauthorized hostilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

The House took up H. Con. Res. 38 on March 4, 2026. The resolution text said Congress had not declared war or specifically authorized hostilities against Iran and directed termination of U.S. Armed Forces hostilities against Iran unless authorized by Congress.

Official floor record shows the Iran War Powers Resolution reached House debate, supporting serious legislative effort but not final success at that point.

partial same_term A for effort

Congressional Record, Volume 172 Issue 41, House, March 4, 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

During debate, Mr. Meeks yielded time to Rep. Jamie Raskin, who argued that allowing a President to start war and then avoid congressional debate would destroy Congress's constitutional war power. The vote was then postponed after the noes appeared to have it.

Raskin personally advanced the War Powers argument on the House floor. The record shows effort, not delivery, because proceedings were postponed and no passage was recorded there.

partial same_term A for effort

Congressional Record, Volume 172 Issue 41, House, March 4, 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

AP reported that the House rejected the Iran war powers resolution on March 5, 2026 by 212-219. Two Republicans supported it with most Democrats, while four Democrats opposed it.

Because an official House roll-call page was not available in the retrieved record, AP is used for the March 5 House result. It shows the initial bipartisan coalition was too small to pass H. Con. Res. 38.

never same_term A for effort

House narrowly rejects Iran war powers resolution in test of Trump's strategy
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

Senate vote 46 on March 4, 2026 rejected, 47-53, a motion to discharge S.J. Res. 104, a joint resolution to direct removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Iran that had not been authorized by Congress.

Official Senate roll-call list confirms a parallel Iran War Powers effort failed in the Senate before the March House vote.

never same_term A for effort

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 119th Congress - 2nd Session (2026)
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

Raskin described living through an unconstitutional war and several failed War Powers Act Resolutions in his May 16, 2026 remarks.

Raskin's own office characterized the War Powers efforts as failed as of mid-May 2026, supporting non-delivery up to that date despite continued effort.

never same_term

Raskin Delivers Commencement Address at American University's Washington College of Law | Press Releases | Congressman Jamie Raskin
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

On June 23, 2026, the Senate agreed to H. Con. Res. 86, a concurrent resolution directing the President to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran. The vote was 50-48, with Republican Senators Cassidy, Collins, Murkowski, and Paul voting yea.

This official roll call shows a later bipartisan coalition did pass an Iran War Powers concurrent resolution in the Senate, including Republican support. It supports the passage component, but the source does not prove the conflict ended.

partial same_term A for effort

U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 184, 119th Congress - 2nd Session
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

The Senate roll-call list shows that on June 24, 2026, the Senate rejected 47-50 a motion to proceed to S.J. Res. 185, another joint resolution directing removal of U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities within or against Iran.

A further Iran War Powers vote occurred and failed one day after the Senate agreed to H. Con. Res. 86, leaving the broader end-of-conflict result unresolved in the official evidence reviewed.

unresolved same_term A for effort

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 119th Congress - 2nd Session (2026)
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 86%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

partial same_term A for effort

Raskin clearly made a serious federal legislative push for a bipartisan Iran War Powers Resolution: he publicly urged Republicans and Democrats to come together, spoke on the House floor, and supported the Massie-Khanna vehicle. The promised outcome was not fully delivered because the cited House effort failed 212-219 on March 5, 2026, Raskin later referred to several failed War Powers Act resolutions on May 16, 2026, and the evidence of later Senate passage shows only one chamber passing a resolution with some Republican support, not enactment or an end to the Iran conflict. The bipartisan coalition and passage components were partially achieved, but the promised end-of-conflict result was not established.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

never same_term A for effort

Raskin clearly pushed a bipartisan War Powers Resolution on Iran, urged Republicans to join the coalition, and the House took up the measure in March 2026. But the record provided does not show enactment or that the conflict was ended; by mid-May 2026 he was still referring to failed War Powers resolutions. That makes this a serious but unsuccessful attempt rather than a delivered promise.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 95%

never same_term A for effort

The evidence shows Raskin clearly made a serious effort to build bipartisan support for an Iran War Powers Resolution, publicly calling for Republicans to join and backing the Massie-Khanna resolution. There was House floor action and voting in March 2026, which demonstrates material legislative effort. But the promise was to welcome Republicans into a bipartisan coalition to pass a War Powers Resolution to end the conflict in Iran, and the record provided does not show the resolution was enacted or that the conflict was ended. Raskin's own May 2026 reference to 'several failed War Powers Act Resolutions' is strong evidence that the effort did not succeed within the relevant term. Under the rubric, a serious attempt that failed to deliver the promised outcome should be scored as never with effort_badge true.

provider openai · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 95%