Following the ICE murder of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, Congresswoman Pressley and Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced the Qualified Immunity Abolition Act of 2026, which builds on the lawmakers’ prior work by granting victims the right to sue federal law enforcement officers—not just state and local—for civil rights violations and abolishing the defense of qualified immunity in these suits.
Give victims the right to sue federal law enforcement officers for civil rights violations.
Occurrences
Following the ICE murder of Renee Good and Alex Pretti, Congresswoman Pressley and Senator Ed Markey (D-MA) introduced the Qualified Immunity Abolition Act of 2026, which builds on the lawmakers' prior work by granting victims the right to sue federal law enforcement officers—not just state and local—for civil rights violations and abolishing the defense of qualified immunity in these suits.
Evidence
Congress.gov shows Rep. Ayanna Pressley sponsored H.R. 1470, the Ending Qualified Immunity Act, which CRS says would eliminate qualified immunity as a defense in civil rights deprivation suits. The bill's latest listed action was referral to a House subcommittee, and its status remained Introduced.
AP reported that after the Minneapolis ICE shooting, Sen. Ed Markey and Rep. Ayanna Pressley renewed the effort with a bill that would let people sue federal law enforcement officers for civil rights violations and strip qualified immunity, but AP said it had little chance in the GOP-controlled Congress.
Congress.gov lists H.R.1470, the Ending Qualified Immunity Act, with Rep. Ayanna Pressley as sponsor, introduced 03/01/2021. Its latest action was 04/28/2021 referral to the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties, and the tracker says the bill has the status Introduced. CRS summarizes that the bill eliminates the defense of qualified immunity in civil actions for deprivation of rights.
The introduced H.R.1470 text says Pressley introduced the bill and that it would amend Section 1979/42 U.S.C. 1983 to remove qualified immunity as a defense. The bill findings describe Section 1983 as a cause of action against people acting under color of State law, including state or local officials, and the operative amendment bars good-faith and clearly-established-law defenses in actions under that section.
Congress.gov's cosponsors page for H.R.7085 lists Rep. Pressley, Ayanna [D-MA-7] as an original cosponsor on 06/04/2020. The same overview shows H.R.7085 was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary on 06/04/2020 and remained at the Introduced status.
The Office of the Law Revision Counsel page states that 42 U.S.C. 1983 text contains laws in effect on June 24, 2026. The statute applies to persons acting under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of any State, Territory, or the District of Columbia, and does not add the United States or federal officers as covered actors.
The Supreme Court held that Bivens does not extend to create causes of action for Boule's Fourth Amendment excessive-force claim and First Amendment retaliation claim against a U.S. Border Patrol agent. The opinion states that, in all but the most unusual circumstances, prescribing a cause of action is a job for Congress, not the courts.
Assessments
The promised outcome was not delivered: current Section 1983 still covers action under color of state, territorial, or D.C. law, not a general statutory right to sue federal law enforcement officers for civil-rights violations, and the Supreme Court has narrowed implied Bivens remedies while saying Congress must create broader causes of action. Pressley did make serious legislative efforts, including cosponsoring and sponsoring Ending Qualified Immunity Act bills and later renewing a bill aimed at federal law enforcement accountability, but the cited bills stalled and were not enacted. Because there was substantial effort but no enacted federal right matching the promise, the correct outcome is never with an effort badge.
Pressley materially advanced the claim by sponsoring the Ending Qualified Immunity Act, which matched the promised policy of allowing civil-rights suits against federal law enforcement officers. But the bill remained introduced and stalled in committee, so the promised outcome was never delivered.