Congressman Lynch has introduced H.R. 976, the Air Traffic Noise and Pollution Expert Consensus Act, legislation requiring the FAA to solicit an Expert Consensus Report from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine that would compile and make available the best scientific information on the health and environmental effects of air traffic noise and pollution.
I will pursue legislation requiring the FAA to obtain an expert consensus report on the health and environmental effects of air traffic noise and pollution.
Occurrences
Evidence
Congress.gov lists H.R.3935 as the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 and shows: Latest Action: 05/16/2024 Became Public Law No: 118-63.
Section 791 requires the Administrator, within 180 days, to seek an agreement with the National Academies for the National Research Council to study airborne ultrafine particles and their effect on airport-adjacent communities, including aviation sources, elevated UFP exposure health effects, fuel sources, mitigation measures, and information gaps.
Section 792 requires the FAA Administrator to establish an Aircraft Noise Advisory Committee to advise on aircraft noise exposure and FAA noise policies. Duties include evaluating existing research on noise impacts and annoyance, assessing alternative noise metrics in consultation with the National Academies, and reporting recommended policy changes.
Roll Call 200 was on the motion to suspend the rules and concur in the Senate amendment to H.R.3935. The status was Passed, 387 yeas to 26 nays. The vote list records Lynch, Democratic, Massachusetts, as Yea.
Congress.gov lists Rep. Sam Graves as sponsor and only three original cosponsors: Rep. Rick Larsen, Rep. Garret Graves, and Rep. Steve Cohen.
Assessments
The enacted 2024 FAA reauthorization included related provisions: a National Academies/National Research Council study on airborne ultrafine particles affecting airport-adjacent communities and an aircraft-noise advisory committee with National Academies consultation. That only partially matches the promise because it does not require a single expert consensus report covering both air traffic noise and pollution health/environmental effects as described. Lynch was in office when the bill passed and voted for final passage, but the evidence does not show he sponsored or materially authored the relevant provisions, so credit is partial rather than delivered.