The Affordable Clean Water Infrastructure Act would strengthen the CWSRF by increasing the amount a state can contribute to reduce project costs for local communities and creating an additional subsidy for rural, small, and tribal water treatment projects.
Strengthen the Clean Water State Revolving Fund to reduce project costs for local communities.
Occurrences
Evidence
The official House homepage lists a May 22, 2026 press release titled "Rep. McDonald Rivet Helps Pass Bipartisan Funding for Roads and Bridges Through Committee."
The article says McDonald Rivet asked for federal funding for water projects including a backup generator at the Valley Drive Pump Station, new water lines, lead and aging pipe replacement, wastewater upgrades, and continued Flint Registry funding.
Congress.gov lists H.R.6464, the Affordable Clean Water Infrastructure Act, with McDonald Rivet as sponsor, introduced December 4, 2025, referred to House Transportation and Infrastructure, and latest action February 2, 2026 referral to the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment. The bill status is Introduced, not enacted.
EPA describes the CWSRF as a federal-state partnership providing low-cost financing to communities for water quality infrastructure projects, and reports $194 billion to communities and 53,000 low-cost loans since 1988.
The report says McDonald Rivet announced federal funding requests for safe drinking water projects, including a backup generator at Valley Drive Pump Station, new water lines, lead and aging pipe replacement, wastewater upgrades, and $5 million for the Flint Registry.
Assessments
McDonald Rivet has some evidence of advocating for water infrastructure funding in her district, but the provided record does not show that she wrote, sponsored, or materially advanced a measure that specifically strengthened the Clean Water State Revolving Fund or reduced project costs through that program. The other cited committee action concerns roads and bridges, not the revolving fund. Because she remains in active federal office and the evidence does not establish either delivery or a failed serious attempt on the specific promise, the claim is best scored as unresolved rather than delivered, partial, or never.