Burlison led 10 House colleagues in seeking an investigation into federal funding for NASEM over bias, conflicts, and possible misuse of taxpayer dollars.
Investigate federal funding for the National Academies over concerns about bias, conflicts of interest, and possible misuse of taxpayer dollars.
Occurrences
House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Chairman James Comer (R-Ky.) and Subcommittee on Economic Growth, Energy Policy, and Regulatory Affairs Chairman Eric Burlison (R-Mo.) today are seeking information from the Department of Energy, Department of War, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) about the scientists and other personnel connected to U.S. nuclear secrets or rocket technology who have died or mysteriously vanished in recent years.
We respectfully urge you to investigate whether NASEM should be suspended or debarred from all federal funding under your jurisdiction
Evidence
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Congressman Eric Burlison (MO-07) led 10 House colleagues in sending a letter to Department of Transportation (DOT) Secretary Sean Duffy and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director Russ Vought requesting an investigation into federal funding awarded to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) over concerns about bias, conflicts of interest, and misuse of taxpayer dollars.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
House Science, Space, and Technology Committee leaders sent a letter to NASEM requesting information; they said publicly available information suggested a troubling pattern of potential conflicts of interest and questioned NASEM’s objectivity, transparency, and committee selection practices, asking NASEM to preserve records and respond by May 8, 2026.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
President Trump directed federal suspension and debarment officials to review the National Academy of Sciences' conduct and stated that taxpayers should not fund alleged climate fraud.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The National Academy of Sciences said questions about the climate chapter's development warranted an independent review and that the chapter would be withheld from its website during that review.
Assessments
Burlison materially advanced the promise in the same federal term by leading colleagues in a May 2026 letter asking DOT and OMB to investigate federal funding awarded to NASEM over bias, conflicts-of-interest, and taxpayer misuse concerns. Related House committee oversight, NASEM's independent process review, and a presidential directive for federal suspension/debarment officials to review NAS conduct show meaningful follow-through around the controversy. However, the evidence does not show that DOT, OMB, or another federal agency completed the specific funding investigation or imposed funding consequences, so this is not full delivery.
Available evidence shows Burlison took a concrete oversight step during the current term by leading a letter to DOT and OMB requesting an investigation into National Academies funding. Related committee activity also shows the issue was actively being examined. However, the record provided does not show that a formal investigation was actually opened, completed, or produced findings or funding consequences. Because the promise was to investigate federal funding and the evidence currently shows a request for investigation rather than a completed investigative outcome, the status is unresolved rather than delivered. Effort is substantial and documented, so an effort badge is warranted.