Ending the Cycle of Dependency Act — Cracks down on abuse in food stamps and other welfare programs by ending broad geographic waivers that undermine work requirements.
Crack down on abuse in food stamps and other welfare programs by ending broad geographic waivers that undermine work requirements.
Occurrences
Evidence
unverified · Source version 23178 · locator unknown
Burlison's office said he opened a roundtable on the Working Families Tax Cuts Act, framed as "Rewarding Work, Not Washington," which shows continued work-focused welfare messaging but not completion of the SNAP waiver goal.
unverified · Source version 1407 · locator unknown
The Ending the Cycle of Dependency Act would cap food-stamp aid, expand work requirements, and eliminate geographic waivers that states use to skirt those rules.
verified · Source version 61439 · locator 1068
The OBBB amends the criteria under which the Secretary may approve a State agency request to waive the ABAWD time limit per section 6(o)(4) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (the Act). The statute, as amended, requires that areas have unemployment rates of over 10 percent to qualify for ABAWD time limit waivers, known as ABAWD waivers. The OBBB removed the criterion allowing for approval of waivers for areas where States identify that there is a lack of sufficient jobs and establishes new ABAWD provisions for Alaska and Hawaii, as detailed below. The statutory changes to ABAWD waiver criteria, as well as the provisions for Alaska and Hawaii, were effective upon enactment.
unverified · Source version 61440 · locator unknown
Roll Call 190 | Bill Number: H. R. 1 Jul 03, 2025, 02:31 PM | 119th Congress, 1st Session Vote Question: On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment One Big Beautiful Bill Act Status: Passed Burlison | Burlison | Republican | MO | Aye
Assessments
Burlison appears to have materially pursued the promise by backing legislation that would eliminate SNAP geographic waivers and tighten work requirements, which is a direct match to the stated goal. But the evidence provided does not show that those waiver changes were enacted or otherwise implemented in federal policy. Later messaging about rewarding work reinforces intent, not completion. Under the federal-office standard, this is a serious legislative attempt without a delivered outcome, so the promise is best judged as not fulfilled with effort credit.