Crack down on abuse in food stamps and other welfare programs by ending broad geographic waivers that undermine work requirements.

Eric Burlison · Missouri · Republican

policy impact 4.00 specificity 1.00 extraction confidence 98%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

unverified · Source version 23178 · locator unknown

Burlison's office said he opened a roundtable on the Working Families Tax Cuts Act, framed as "Rewarding Work, Not Washington," which shows continued work-focused welfare messaging but not completion of the SNAP waiver goal.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Recent official activity keeps the work-requirements theme active, but it does not show that broad geographic waivers were actually ended.

unresolved same_term A for effort

Representative Burlison |
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 74%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 1407 · locator unknown

The Ending the Cycle of Dependency Act would cap food-stamp aid, expand work requirements, and eliminate geographic waivers that states use to skirt those rules.

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Direct legislative attempt to do exactly what the promise described, but the available official record here does not show enactment.

partial same_term A for effort

Bills Introduced | Representative Burlison
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 61439 · locator 1068

The OBBB amends the criteria under which the Secretary may approve a State agency request to waive the ABAWD time limit per section 6(o)(4) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (the Act). The statute, as amended, requires that areas have unemployment rates of over 10 percent to qualify for ABAWD time limit waivers, known as ABAWD waivers. The OBBB removed the criterion allowing for approval of waivers for areas where States identify that there is a lack of sufficient jobs and establishes new ABAWD provisions for Alaska and Hawaii, as detailed below. The statutory changes to ABAWD waiver criteria, as well as the provisions for Alaska and Hawaii, were effective upon enactment.

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): USDA implementation guidance says Public Law 119-21 changed SNAP ABAWD waiver criteria, removed the prior lack-of-sufficient-jobs basis for waivers, and made the changes effective on enactment. This is concrete delivery of the food-stamp geographic-waiver portion of the commitment, though not a total abolition of every possible waiver.

delivered same_term

fns.snap-obbb-abawd-waivers-implementation.pdf
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

unverified · Source version 61440 · locator unknown

Roll Call 190 | Bill Number: H. R. 1 Jul 03, 2025, 02:31 PM | 119th Congress, 1st Session Vote Question: On Motion to Concur in the Senate Amendment One Big Beautiful Bill Act Status: Passed Burlison | Burlison | Republican | MO | Aye

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): The official House roll call shows Burlison voted Aye on final House concurrence for H.R. 1, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which later became Public Law 119-21 and contained the SNAP waiver restriction.

delivered same_term A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

Public state: unverified As of unknown · legacy_unverified · . Original AI recommendation (not independently established): never. unknown A for effort

Burlison appears to have materially pursued the promise by backing legislation that would eliminate SNAP geographic waivers and tighten work requirements, which is a direct match to the stated goal. But the evidence provided does not show that those waiver changes were enacted or otherwise implemented in federal policy. Later messaging about rewarding work reinforces intent, not completion. Under the federal-office standard, this is a serious legislative attempt without a delivered outcome, so the promise is best judged as not fulfilled with effort credit.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 95%