Mark Alford will fund National Security Investment Programs so foreign assistance supports national security rather than woke projects overseas.

Mark Alford · Missouri · Republican

spending impact 2.00 specificity 1.00 extraction confidence 90%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

The House Appropriations subcommittee member list identifies Mark Alford as a majority member of the National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Subcommittee.

Alford held a relevant appropriations subcommittee seat for the later-term work on State/foreign-operations funding.

partial later_term A for effort

House Appropriations Committee: National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Subcommittee Member List
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 86%

Contest this evidence item

The FY26 bill summary says the bill creates a $6.89 billion National Security Investment Programs account, consolidating three prior accounts for strategic economic assistance tied to U.S. national security interests. It also says the bill bars wasteful DEI, woke programming, climate mandates, and divisive gender ideology spending.

Official committee materials directly match the promise: fund a new NSIP account and redirect foreign assistance away from DEI/woke or climate/gender programs toward national security priorities.

delivered later_term A for effort

FY26 National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Bill Summary - Full Committee
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 91%

Contest this evidence item

House Roll Call 28 shows H.R. 7006, the Financial Services and General Government and National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2026, passed 341-79; Mark Alford voted Yea.

Alford voted for the House-passed FY2026 bill that contained the National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs appropriations package.

delivered later_term A for effort

Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 90%

Contest this evidence item

Bill text establishes Division B for National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs and repeatedly appropriates or restricts funds under the National Security Investment Programs heading, including assistance strategy and country-specific limits.

The bill text confirms that National Security Investment Programs was an operative appropriations account in the FY2026 package Alford supported.

delivered later_term A for effort

H.R. 7006, Financial Services and General Government and National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2026
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

The FY2026 enacted legislation page lists the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026, and includes National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs among enacted full-year legislation summaries.

Official House Appropriations records indicate the FY2026 national security/state/foreign-operations package moved into enacted full-year appropriations, supporting delivery beyond a House-only vote.

delivered later_term A for effort

House Appropriations Committee: Fiscal Year 2026 Enacted Legislation
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 82%

Contest this evidence item

The FY24 House bill summary described a $52.5 billion State/Foreign Operations bill prioritizing national security, countering China, supporting allies, cutting lower-priority programs, prohibiting DEI implementation, and blocking drag shows, climate funds, and gender-related programs.

Before the later FY2026 delivery, House Republicans advanced a similar State/Foreign Operations funding package aligned with the promise's national-security-over-woke-framing.

partial same_term A for effort

FY24 State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Bill Summary
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 86%

Contest this evidence item

House Roll Call 500 shows H.R. 4665, the FY2024 Department of State, foreign operations, and related programs appropriations bill, passed 216-212; Mark Alford voted Yea.

Alford supported the earlier House-passed FY2024 foreign-operations bill containing national-security priorities and anti-DEI/anti-woke restrictions, though that standalone House bill was not the final enacted FY2024 law.

partial same_term A for effort

House Clerk Roll Call 500, H.R. 4665, 118th Congress
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 89%

Contest this evidence item

House Roll Call 102 shows the FY2024 further consolidated appropriations package passed 286-134; Mark Alford voted Nay on the motion concurring in the Senate amendment to H.R. 2882.

Alford did not support the enacted FY2024 minibus that included State and Foreign Operations, so the earlier FY2024 effort did not itself fulfill the promise for him.

partial same_term A for effort

House Clerk Roll Call 102, H. Res. 1102 / H.R. 2882, 118th Congress
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

delivered later_term

The promise was to fund a National Security Investment Programs-style foreign assistance account and steer aid toward national security priorities instead of DEI/woke, climate, or gender-ideology programs. The FY2026 appropriations materials directly describe a $6.89 billion National Security Investment Programs account and restrictions aligned with that promise, and the House records show Alford voted for the package. His relevant appropriations subcommittee role gives him more than incidental credit. The earlier FY2024 House effort was not enacted with his support, but the later FY2026 package appears to have completed the promised outcome, so this is delivered in a later term.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 84%