I am proud to join my colleagues in filing this amicus brief to defend Congress’s institutional prerogatives and protect the constitutional balance that safeguards our democracy.
Defend Congress's constitutional authority to set its own rules and proceedings.
Occurrences
Evidence
"If upheld, this case would deal a devastating blow to Congress’s constitutional authority to determine its own rules and proceedings, authority that is fundamental to the separation of powers," said Representative Nadler. The release says the members filed an amicus brief to defend Congress’ authority in Texas v. Bondi.
The brief argues that the Constitution grants Congress broad authority to set its own rules of operation and proceedings, and warns that judicial interference would undercut that authority.
Nadler released a statement after voting against final passage of the Surface Transportation Reauthorization bill during committee markup.
Assessments
The promise is framed as a commitment to defend Congress's constitutional authority over its own rules and proceedings. The evidence shows Nadler took a concrete official action toward that goal by joining and publicizing an amicus brief in Texas v. Bondi arguing that courts should not undermine Congress's rulemaking authority. That is direct, material effort consistent with the promise. However, the record provided does not show a completed outcome such as a final court victory or other definitive preservation of that authority attributable to Nadler. Because he clearly acted to defend the authority but the end result is not shown as achieved, this is best scored as partial rather than delivered.