Press AI companies to improve accountability and ensure accurate, unbiased information for voters in the 2026 elections.

Michael Lawler · New York · Republican

oversight impact 2.00 specificity 1.00 extraction confidence 88%

Commitment kind: unknown. Promised action: not established. Promised outcome: not established. Deadline: unknown; not assumed expired.

Contest this claim

Occurrences

sent a bipartisan letter to the CEOs of leading artificial intelligence companies, raising concerns about the role AI platforms will play in the 2026 midterm elections and the need to ensure voters receive accurate, unbiased information

Lawler sent a letter pressing AI companies for accountability and election information accuracy.

News List | Congressman Mike Lawler
primary · other · model gpt-5.4-mini

Evidence

unverified · Source version 57643 · locator unknown

We request a written response to the following questions no later than 30 days from the date of this letter:

Unverified model/legacy excerpt; not proof. AI summary (separate from source): Lawler and Gottheimer sent a formal letter to major AI company CEOs seeking written answers before the 2026 midterms about bias, accuracy, audits, disclosures, sourcing, and correction policies.

delivered same_term A for effort

joint_letter_to_ai_companies_on_election_05-13-26.pdf
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

verified · Source version 57645 · locator 3280

We also urge you to deepen engagement with major AI companies to understand their safeguard protocols, testing practices, and mechanisms for identifying political bias, misinformation, or model vulnerabilities that could affect voters.

Fetched verbatim passage. AI summary (separate from source): A later Lawler-Gottheimer letter to CISA, DOJ, FEC, and DHS continued the effort by pressing federal agencies to coordinate with AI companies on election-related safeguards, bias, misinformation, and model vulnerabilities.

delivered same_term A for effort

letter_to_the_admin_on_ai_models_midterms_final.pdf
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

No assessments yet.