The Halo Act, a companion bill to Senator Ashley Moody’s (R-FL) S.3179, would establish criminal penalties for individuals who, after being verbally warned, remain within a 25-foot “halo” around a harassed officer. These penalties would apply to anyone interfering with, threatening, or harassing that officer while they are carrying out lawful immigration enforcement duties.
Support legislation to establish criminal penalties for individuals who, after being warned, remain within a 25-foot buffer zone around harassed federal immigration enforcement officers and interfere with, threaten, or harass them during lawful duties.
Occurrences
Evidence
Official bill page identifies S.3179 (Halo Act) as introduced on 11/18/2025, with the official title: “A bill to amend title 18, United States Code, to establish a criminal penalty for obstructing immigration enforcement activities.” It lists the latest action as read twice and referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee, and the tracker status as Introduced.
The introduced text creates an offense for a person who, after a verbal warning, knowingly violates the warning and approaches or remains within 25 feet of a federal immigration enforcement officer with intent to impede, threaten physical harm, or harass, and sets a penalty of fine, up to 5 years imprisonment, or both.
Rulli’s office states that he introduced the Halo Act (H.R. 7846), describing it as a companion bill to S.3179 that would establish criminal penalties for individuals who, after being verbally warned, remain within a 25-foot “halo” around a harassed officer while interfering with, threatening, or harassing that officer during lawful immigration enforcement duties.
Assessments
The promise was to support legislation establishing criminal penalties tied to a 25-foot buffer zone around federal immigration enforcement officers. Evidence shows Rulli took a concrete step by introducing the House Halo Act companion bill, and the bill text closely matches the promised policy. However, the available evidence only shows introduction and committee referral, not passage by Congress or enactment into law. Because the term is ongoing and the legislative effort is active but not completed, the best judgment is unresolved rather than delivered or never.