Support a Balanced Budget Cosponsored H.J.Res.22 for a balanced budget amendment to address national debt and curb spending.
Support a balanced budget amendment to address national debt and curb spending.
Occurrences
Evidence
“This resolution prioritizes ... enacting historic spending cuts to rein in waste, fraud, and abuse. Our nation is on an unsustainable path ... This budget lays the groundwork for making the President’s tax cuts permanent and restoring fiscal responsibility in Washington.”
“The RSC Budget constrains federal spending through a Balanced Budget amendment, with the inclusion of taxpayer protections.”
House conservatives say they’ve crafted a plan to rein in government spending and balance the federal budget in seven years. Kevin Hern, R-Okla., chairman of the Republican Study Committee’s Budget and Spending Task Force.
After the passage of the Limit, Save, Grow Act, Chairman Hern sent this letter to Members of the Republican Study Committee, calling for Members to stand strong and do the hard work of getting the Limit, Save, Grow Act through the Senate.
“We need an earnest, dedicated effort to return to fiscally sound policymaking on Capitol Hill.”
Assessments
Hern publicly backed fiscal plans and House budget proposals that referenced a balanced-budget amendment and spending cuts, which shows real support for the idea. But the record here does not show him sponsoring, passing, or otherwise delivering an actual balanced-budget amendment, so this is only partial credit rather than full fulfillment.
The promise is to support a balanced budget amendment to address national debt and curb spending. The evidence shows Hern consistently backed spending-cut and fiscal-restraint measures, endorsed an RSC budget blueprint that explicitly referenced a balanced budget amendment, and pushed packages like the Limit, Save, Grow Act. That demonstrates real support and effort toward the goal, especially on curbing spending. However, there is no evidence here that a balanced budget amendment was enacted, advanced to final passage, or otherwise delivered. Because he clearly supported and materially advocated for the policy direction but did not achieve the specific amendment outcome, the best judgment is partial rather than delivered.