Support a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United.

Brian Schatz · Hawaii · Democratic

policy impact 0.86 specificity 0.94 extraction confidence 95%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

Congress.gov lists S.J.Res.19 as a constitutional amendment on election contributions and expenditures and lists Sen. Brian Schatz as a cosponsor dated 05/01/2014.

Schatz formally cosponsored the 2014 Democracy for All constitutional amendment during his Senate service, satisfying a promise to support such an amendment.

delivered same_term A for effort

Congress.gov: All Info - S.J.Res.19 - 113th Congress (2013-2014)
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 98%

Contest this evidence item

The Senate roll call for cloture on S.J.Res.19 records the measure title as a constitutional amendment on election spending and records Schatz (D-HI) voting Yea.

Schatz voted to advance the constitutional amendment; the cloture motion was rejected 54-42, but his recorded vote is direct support.

delivered same_term A for effort

U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 113th Congress - 2nd Session, Vote 261
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 99%

Contest this evidence item

The Senate Judiciary Committee report says S.J.Res.19 was intended to restore federal and state authority to set reasonable limits on campaign contributions and expenditures, and discusses Citizens United as a core reason for the amendment.

This official report confirms that the amendment Schatz cosponsored and voted for was aimed at the post-Citizens United campaign-finance regime.

delivered same_term A for effort

Senate Report 113-223 to accompany S.J.Res.19
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 96%

Contest this evidence item

The Senate Judiciary release describes the Democracy for All Amendment as a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and lists Brian Schatz among the Senate Democratic caucus cosponsors.

Schatz continued supporting the amendment in a later Senate term through cosponsorship of the 2019 reintroduction.

delivered later_term A for effort

Senate Judiciary Democrats: Feinstein, Udall, Shaheen, Senate Dems Introduce Constitutional Amendment Overturning Citizens United
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

Congress.gov lists Brian Schatz as an original 09/14/2023 cosponsor of S.J.Res.45; CRS summarizes it as authorizing limits on election fundraising and spending and allowing distinctions between natural persons and corporations.

Schatz again cosponsored a Senate constitutional amendment aimed at restoring authority to regulate campaign spending after Citizens United.

delivered later_term A for effort

Congress.gov: All Info - S.J.Res.45 - 118th Congress (2023-2024)
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

Congress.gov lists Schatz as an original 03/27/2025 cosponsor of S.J.Res.43 and summarizes the resolution as a constitutional amendment letting Congress and states limit election-related money, including corporate spending.

As of the current Congress before 2026-05-31, Schatz remained an original cosponsor of the Democracy for All Amendment approach.

delivered later_term A for effort

Congress.gov: All Info - S.J.Res.43 - 119th Congress (2025-2026)
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

delivered same_term A for effort

Schatz directly supported the promised constitutional amendment while serving as U.S. Senator: he cosponsored S.J.Res.19 on May 1, 2014 and voted yea on cloture for the measure on September 11, 2014. The promise was to support an amendment, not to secure ratification, so formal cosponsorship and a recorded supportive vote satisfy it in the same federal Senate term. Later cosponsorships reinforce continued support but are not needed for delivery.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 99%