Pass a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United.
Support a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United.
Occurrences
Evidence
Congress.gov lists S.J.Res.19 as a constitutional amendment on election contributions and expenditures and lists Sen. Brian Schatz as a cosponsor dated 05/01/2014.
The Senate roll call for cloture on S.J.Res.19 records the measure title as a constitutional amendment on election spending and records Schatz (D-HI) voting Yea.
The Senate Judiciary Committee report says S.J.Res.19 was intended to restore federal and state authority to set reasonable limits on campaign contributions and expenditures, and discusses Citizens United as a core reason for the amendment.
The Senate Judiciary release describes the Democracy for All Amendment as a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United and lists Brian Schatz among the Senate Democratic caucus cosponsors.
Congress.gov lists Brian Schatz as an original 09/14/2023 cosponsor of S.J.Res.45; CRS summarizes it as authorizing limits on election fundraising and spending and allowing distinctions between natural persons and corporations.
Congress.gov lists Schatz as an original 03/27/2025 cosponsor of S.J.Res.43 and summarizes the resolution as a constitutional amendment letting Congress and states limit election-related money, including corporate spending.
Assessments
Schatz directly supported the promised constitutional amendment while serving as U.S. Senator: he cosponsored S.J.Res.19 on May 1, 2014 and voted yea on cloture for the measure on September 11, 2014. The promise was to support an amendment, not to secure ratification, so formal cosponsorship and a recorded supportive vote satisfy it in the same federal Senate term. Later cosponsorships reinforce continued support but are not needed for delivery.