Prohibit federal agencies from taking adverse action against a person solely because they provide business assistance to a cannabis-related legitimate business.

Guy Reschenthaler · Pennsylvania · Republican

policy impact 3.00 specificity 1.00 extraction confidence 97%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

“To prohibit Federal agencies from taking any adverse action against a person solely because the person provides business assistance to a cannabis-related legitimate business...” Last Action Date Listed: March 18, 2026. Action: Mr. Reschenthaler (for himself and Mr. Carter of Louisiana) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services.

Reschenthaler introduced the bill matching the claim, but the official record shows only introduction and referral to committee, not enactment or committee passage.

unresolved same_term A for effort

H.R. 7987 (IH) - Capital Lending and Investment for Marijuana Businesses Act - BILLS-119hr7987ih | Content Details | GovInfo
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 97%

Contest this evidence item

“H.R. 7987. A bill to prohibit Federal agencies from taking any adverse action against a person solely because the person provides business assistance to a cannabis-related legitimate business, to amend the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ...; to the Committee on Financial Services.”

The Congressional Record confirms the bill’s filing and referral on March 18, 2026, but provides no later floor action or final disposition within the lookback window.

unresolved same_term A for effort

CREC-2026-03-18-house.pdf
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

unresolved same_term A for effort

Reschenthaler clearly took concrete action by introducing H.R. 7987 in March 2026, and the bill text matches the promise. However, the available evidence shows only introduction and referral to the House Financial Services Committee, with no committee approval, chamber passage, enactment, or implemented federal prohibition yet documented. Because the promise concerns an actual policy change and there is no evidence the change has been achieved, it cannot be marked delivered. Since the bill is newly introduced in the same term and its final fate is not established in the record provided, the best classification is unresolved rather than never. His introduction of the bill warrants an effort badge.

provider openai · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 96%