Specifically, the Women’s Health Protection Act would: - Prohibit states from imposing restrictions that jeopardize access to abortion earlier in pregnancy, including many of the state-level restrictions in place prior to Dobbs, such as arbitrary waiting periods, medically unnecessary mandatory ultrasounds or requirements to provide medically inaccurate information.
Support legislation prohibiting states from imposing restrictions that jeopardize access to abortion earlier in pregnancy, such as arbitrary waiting periods, mandatory ultrasounds, or requirements to provide medically inaccurate information.
Occurrences
"Specifically, the Women’s Health Protection Act would: Prohibit states from imposing restrictions that jeopardize access to abortion earlier in pregnancy, including many of the state-level restrictions in place prior to Dobbs, such as arbitrary waiting periods, medically unnecessary mandatory ultrasounds or requirements to provide medically inaccurate information."
The bill aims to prohibit states from imposing restrictions that jeopardize access to abortion earlier in pregnancy...
The Women’s Health Protection Act would: Prohibit states from imposing restrictions that jeopardize access to abortion earlier in pregnancy, including many of the state-level restrictions in place prior to Dobbs, such as arbitrary waiting periods, medically unnecessary mandatory ultrasounds, or requirements to provide medically inaccurate information... The legislation is sponsored by the entire Democratic caucus, including... Tammy Duckworth (D-IL)
The Women’s Health Protection Act would prohibit states from imposing restrictions that jeopardize access to abortion earlier in pregnancy, including arbitrary waiting periods, medically unnecessary mandatory ultrasounds, or requirements to provide medically inaccurate information.
Evidence
The Women's Health Protection Act creates federal rights for patients and providers to protect abortion access. Specifically, the Women's Health Protection Act would: Prohibit states from imposing restrictions that jeopardize access to abortion earlier in pregnancy, including many of the state-level restrictions in place prior to Dobbs, such as arbitrary waiting periods, medically unnecessary mandatory ultrasounds, or requirements to provide medically inaccurate information.
The Women's Health Protection Act creates federal rights for patients and providers to protect abortion access. Specifically, the Women's Health Protection Act would: Prohibit states from imposing restrictions that jeopardize access to abortion earlier in pregnancy, including many of the state-level restrictions in place prior to Dobbs, such as arbitrary waiting periods, medically unnecessary mandatory ultrasounds, or requirements to provide medically inaccurate information.
Latest Action: Senate - 06/24/2025 Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. Sponsor: Sen. Baldwin, Tammy [D-WI]. Cosponsors include Sen. Duckworth, Tammy [D-IL].
Duckworth joined Senate Democrats in introducing the Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025, described as legislation to guarantee access to abortion everywhere across the country and restore the right to comprehensive reproductive health care.
Duckworth and Durbin announced the Women's Health Protection Act of 2025, presenting it as legislation to restore abortion access nationwide and block restrictive state rules.
The official bill record lists Sen. Duckworth as a cosponsor and shows the bill was read twice and referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
Duckworth's office says she and Durbin helped introduce the Women's Health Protection Act of 2025 to restore abortion access nationwide and block restrictive state rules.
The official bill record lists Duckworth as a cosponsor and shows the measure was read twice and referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee, with no enactment.
The bill's summary describes federal protections that would stop states from imposing restrictions that burden abortion access earlier in pregnancy, including waiting periods, mandatory ultrasounds, and medically inaccurate information requirements.
Assessments
The promise was to support legislation blocking state abortion restrictions such as waiting periods, mandatory ultrasounds, and medically inaccurate counseling requirements. The evidence shows Tammy Duckworth helped introduce and cosponsored the Women’s Health Protection Act of 2025 during her current Senate term, and the bill’s stated provisions directly match those restrictions. Because the claim is about supporting legislation rather than successfully enacting it, her sponsorship and public advocacy satisfy the promise in the federal legislative context.
Duckworth did materially support and help introduce the 2025 Women’s Health Protection Act, which matches the promise’s goal of blocking state abortion restrictions like waiting periods and mandatory ultrasounds. But the bill was only introduced, read twice, and referred to committee, so the promised policy was not actually delivered into law.
Duckworth fulfilled the promise as framed because it was a commitment to support legislation prohibiting state restrictions that jeopardize early abortion access, not a promise that the legislation would become law. The 2025 Women’s Health Protection Act directly matches the promised policy, including prohibitions on arbitrary waiting periods, medically unnecessary mandatory ultrasounds, and medically inaccurate information requirements, and Duckworth cosponsored/helped introduce it during her current Senate term. The bill was referred to committee and not enacted, but enactment is not required to satisfy a support-legislation promise.
Tammy Duckworth supported the Women's Health Protection Act, which specifically sought to prohibit states from imposing restrictions that jeopardize access to abortion earlier in pregnancy, such as arbitrary waiting periods, mandatory ultrasounds, or requirements for medically inaccurate information. However, the evidence indicates legislative support and introduction of the bill, without confirmation of its passage into law. This fulfills the 'support' portion of the promise but not the ultimate outcome of enacted federal prohibition, warranting a 'partial' outcome with an effort badge due to substantive legislative activity.