Restore the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau so it can lower prices for consumers.

Angela D. Alsobrooks · Maryland · Democratic

policy impact 0.67 specificity 0.78 extraction confidence 86%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

Evidence

Alsobrooks said she filed an amendment that would direct the Senate to restore the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau so it can do its job to lower prices for consumers.

This is the office source for the CFPB restoration pledge and shows she framed it as an amendment during the FY2026 budget process.

partial same_term A for effort

Senator Alsobrooks Forces Vote Capping Child Care Costs at 7% of Income
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 92%

Contest this evidence item

SA 5090 was submitted by Sen. Alsobrooks and ordered to lie on the table. The amendment concerned lowering costs for consumers, including reinstating previously rescinded funding for the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection and prohibiting future layoffs.

Official record shows concrete same-term legislative action by Alsobrooks, but the amendment was only ordered to lie on the table and did not itself restore the CFPB.

partial same_term A for effort

Congressional Record - Senate, April 22, 2026, SA 5212
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

S.2429 would amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act to ensure the Bureau retains adequate resources for fair, transparent, and competitive markets and whistleblower protections. Congress.gov lists Alsobrooks among the introducing senators/cosponsors, with latest action referred to Senate Banking on July 24, 2025.

Alsobrooks backed a bill aimed at restoring CFPB resources, but Congress.gov shows it remained introduced/referred, not enacted by the as-of date.

partial same_term A for effort

S.2429 - Stop the Scammers Act, 119th Congress
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%

Contest this evidence item

CRS reports that P.L. 119-21 reduced the CFPB annual funding cap by 46%, from $823 million under the Dodd-Frank formula in FY2025 to $446 million, and reduced the prior 12% cap figure to 6.5%.

Rather than being restored, CFPB funding authority was reduced in the same Congress, which weighs against fulfillment.

never same_term

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Budget: Background, Trends, and Policy Options
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 93%

Contest this evidence item

On passage of H.R. 1 as amended, the Senate vote was 50-50 with the Vice President voting yea; the bill passed. Alsobrooks voted Nay.

Alsobrooks opposed the reconciliation bill that later became P.L. 119-21 and reduced CFPB funding, but the adverse bill still passed.

partial same_term A for effort

U.S. Senate Roll Call Vote 372, H.R.1, 119th Congress, 1st Session
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 95%

Contest this evidence item

The court found that CFPB leadership ordered employees to stop work on February 10, 2025, and was engaged in a hurried effort to dismantle and disable the agency; the court entered a preliminary injunction to preserve the agency while litigation proceeded.

Court findings show the CFPB was under active dismantling pressure, with preservation dependent on litigation rather than a completed legislative restoration.

never same_term

National Treasury Employees Union v. Vought, Memorandum Opinion, D.D.C. Document 87
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 88%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

never same_term A for effort

Alsobrooks materially attempted to advance the promise by filing a CFPB restoration amendment, backing S.2429, and voting against legislation that reduced CFPB funding. However, the amendment did not pass, S.2429 remained referred rather than enacted, and P.L. 119-21 reduced CFPB funding authority instead of restoring it. The promised restoration was not delivered, but the record shows a serious same-term effort.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 94%