I stand ready to work with my colleagues on real tax reform... Let’s work together to pass real tax reform with broad support from both sides of the aisle... Make the decision to not add trillions more to the deficit. Make the decision to not cut Medicare and Medicaid for Americans in need.
Work with colleagues to pass bipartisan tax reform that reduces middle-class tax burdens, avoids adding to the deficit, and protects Medicare and Medicaid.
Occurrences
We stand ready to work with you in good faith to craft legislation that can achieve 60 votes in the Senate.
Evidence
Peters opposed the 2018 budget path for a tax bill, saying it would increase the deficit by $1.5 trillion, cut Medicare and Medicaid, and that successful tax reform needed broad bipartisan input.
On passage of H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the Senate vote result was Bill Passed, 51 yeas to 49 nays. Peters (D-MI) voted Nay.
CBO and JCT estimated H.R. 1 would increase deficits by about $1.414 trillion before debt service and $1.672 trillion including debt service over 2018-2027.
Peters and Slotkin urged bipartisan negotiations on tax reform, calling for fiscally responsible solutions, tax policies helping middle-class families, and legislation capable of achieving 60 Senate votes.
On passage of H.R. 1 as amended, the Senate split 50-50 and the Vice President voted Yea. Peters (D-MI) voted Nay.
CRS says P.L. 119-21 includes health provisions affecting Medicaid, CHIP, Medicare, and private insurance; CBO estimated the health provisions reduce federal outlays by $1.1 trillion and Medicaid provisions by $989.7 billion over FY2025-FY2034.
Assessments
Peters consistently advocated the promised framework in office: bipartisan tax reform aimed at middle-class relief, without increasing the deficit, and without cutting Medicare or Medicaid. That shows a serious legislative effort. But the major tax legislation enacted during his Senate service did not satisfy the promise and was not something he helped pass: he voted against the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which passed on a narrow partisan vote and was officially estimated to increase deficits substantially. Later tax-and-budget legislation also was not bipartisan Peters-backed reform, and Peters opposed it as well; official analysis indicated significant Medicaid reductions, which conflicts with the protection pledge. Because he made a meaningful effort but did not deliver the promised enacted outcome, this is best scored as never with an effort badge.