Congress has the power of the purse, and we have an obligation to use it to stop this abuse.
Use Congress's power of the purse to stop a proposed $1.7 billion taxpayer-funded fund for January 6 defendants, Trump-connected entities, and MAGA allies.
Occurrences
issued the following statement on reports that President Trump is moving to create a $1.7 billion taxpayer-funded fund for January 6 defendants, Trump-connected entities, and MAGA allies
Evidence
Walkinshaw said Congress has the power of the purse and must use it to stop President Trump’s reported plan to create a $1.7 billion taxpayer-funded fund for January 6 defendants, Trump-connected entities, and MAGA allies.
AP reported that a federal judge extended an indefinite block on the fund, said the administration was scrapping the plan amid bipartisan backlash, and noted that no money had been paid out and no claims accepted.
Walkinshaw said, "Congress has the power of the purse, and we have an obligation to use it to stop this abuse."
Blanche said the administration was "not moving forward with the fund, period."
A federal judge kept the fund blocked because the government had not filed sworn proof that it was dead.
Assessments
Walkinshaw clearly made the promise, but the record here does not show Congress actually using appropriations power or Walkinshaw materially advancing a successful purse-based legislative block. The fund was instead halted by a court order and then publicly abandoned by the Trump administration amid backlash, with no payouts made. That means the underlying outcome was partly achieved in the same term, but mostly through judicial and executive actions rather than Walkinshaw delivering the promised congressional mechanism or outcome himself. The court's insistence on sworn proof that the plan was truly dead also keeps the result short of a clean full delivery.
Walkinshaw publicly urged Congress to use the power of the purse to stop the proposed fund, but the evidence does not show he personally advanced an appropriations measure or other legislative action that caused the result. The fund was later blocked and then scrapped amid court action and executive retreat, so the promised outcome was achieved only with limited candidate credit.