McClellan, Moolenaar, Obernolte Introduce Legislation to Ban Dangerous Communications Tech from China, Russia and More; introduced the bipartisan Guarding the U.S. Against Adversarial Robotics Dominance (GUARD) Act.
Ban or restrict dangerous communications-enabled robotics technology from China, Russia, and other foreign adversary countries through the GUARD Act.
Occurrences
Evidence
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Rep. Jennifer McClellan's office announced that McClellan, Chairman John Moolenaar, and Rep. Jay Obernolte introduced the bipartisan Guarding the U.S. Against Adversarial Robotics Dominance Act, or GUARD Act, on June 3, 2026.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
Quiver summarized the underlying McClellan press release as legislation introduced to scrutinize and potentially ban foreign-made robots posing national security risks, aimed at importation of robots from China and other foreign adversaries deemed a national security threat.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
AUVSI said the GUARD Act would direct a national security agency to evaluate certain humanoid and quadruped robotics systems from countries of concern, including China, and place systems posing unacceptable risk, or not evaluated on time, on the FCC Covered List, effectively restricting sale in the United States.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The FCC notice states that, as of May 6, 2026, the Covered List included foreign-produced UAS and UAS critical components, added December 22, 2025, and foreign-produced routers, added March 23, 2026, with limited conditional approvals and exemptions.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The House Energy and Commerce Communications and Technology Subcommittee reported that H.R. 9129, the GUARD Act, was forwarded to the full committee by voice vote.
legacy_unverified · Source version not recorded · locator unknown
The FCC added foreign-produced advanced robotic devices to the Covered List, with a Conditional Approval exception, and said covered equipment cannot receive equipment authorizations.
Assessments
McClellan materially advanced the GUARD Act in her current House term by joining its June 3, 2026 introduction and the bill later advanced from the Communications and Technology Subcommittee on September 1, 2026. But the GUARD Act has not passed the House, passed the Senate, become law, or been implemented. A related FCC Covered List action now restricts foreign-produced advanced robotic devices, which partially matches the promised policy substance, but it was not completed through enacted GUARD Act legislation and cannot be credited as full delivery of this specific promise.
McClellan materially advanced the promised policy by introducing the GUARD Act during her current House term, and the bill's mechanism matches the claimed ban/restriction pathway. But the evidence only shows introduction and supporting statements, not enactment, FCC Covered List implementation under the GUARD Act, or an operative ban/restriction on the covered robotics technology. Existing FCC restrictions on related UAS/router categories do not fulfill this specific GUARD Act promise.