Require federal agency relocation proposals to submit a cost-benefit analysis to Congress to ensure relocations are in taxpayers' and the agency mission's interest.

Suhas Subramanyam · Virginia · Democratic

oversight impact 0.55 specificity 0.83 extraction confidence 84%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

The legislation would require a cost-benefit analysis to be submitted to Congress in order to ensure that any attempt to move federal agencies is appropriately analyzed to guarantee it is in the best interest of the taxpayer and the agency’s mission.

The release describes Subramanyam-led Cost of Relocations Act as requiring federal agency relocation plans to undergo congressional cost-benefit review.

National Capital Region Democrats’ Statement on Relocation of USDA’s Food Assistance Employees
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.5

Evidence

Congress.gov shows 22 sponsored bills for Rep. Subramanyam. The newest sponsored item on the page is H.R.7516, introduced on 2026-02-11 and referred to the House Committee on Financial Services; the displayed sponsored items remain at introduced/referred stages. The page does not show any sponsor activity in the 2026-05-22 to 2026-06-20 lookback window that matches a federal relocation cost-benefit mandate.

Inference from the official member page: no concrete legislative action matching this pledge appears in the last 30 days, so the commitment remains unresolved.

unresolved same_term

Suhas Subramanyam | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
secondary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 86%

Contest this evidence item

The official House homepage for Subramanyam's office lists recent items in the lookback window as June 9, 2026 gun-violence bills, June 8, 2026 gun-violence bills, and a May 26, 2026 DHS credit-card letter. It does not show any relocation-proposal cost-benefit announcement or related official action in the window.

Inference from the office homepage: recent official activity is unrelated to the pledge, which leaves the commitment unresolved for this refresh.

unresolved same_term

Representative Suhas Subramanyam |
primary · model gpt-5.4-mini · confidence 66%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

unresolved unknown

Subramanyam is still in federal office, and the provided evidence does not show that he enacted or materially advanced a requirement that federal agency relocation proposals include a cost-benefit analysis submitted to Congress. The record cited from his House page and Congress.gov shows no matching bill, enacted provision, or documented official action tied to this pledge in the relevant window. Because the evidence mainly shows absence of confirmed action rather than a completed failure or delivered outcome, the most defensible judgment is unresolved.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.4 · confidence 82%