Work to ensure the $13,103,920 in Community Project Funding for twenty projects across Missouri's Fifth Congressional District is enacted and delivered to the district.

Emanuel Cleaver · Missouri · Democratic

spending impact 0.62 specificity 0.86 extraction confidence 93%

Contest this claim

Occurrences

As the appropriations process continues to move forward, I will do everything in my power to ensure they make their way home to the people of the Fifth District.

Cleaver committed to doing everything in his power to ensure the announced community project funding investments are finalized and delivered to Missouri's Fifth District.

Congressman Cleaver Secures Over $13 Million in House Appropriations Legislation to Support Local Projects Across Missouri’s Fifth District | Congressman Emanuel Cleaver
primary · press_release · model gpt-5.5

Evidence

Latest News lists a June 26, 2026 release: Cleaver visited Heroes Home Gate Campus and presented an $850,000 federal investment for homeless veterans.

Within the 2026-06-07 to 2026-07-06 lookback window, Cleaver's official site reports concrete delivery activity for one identified Community Project Funding-related project, but not delivery of all claimed funds/projects.

partial same_term A for effort

Congressman Emanuel Cleaver |
primary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 82%

Contest this evidence item

Cleaver's FY24 disclosure lists submitted district projects and says submission to the committee is not a guarantee of funding; Heroes Home Gate requested $2,300,000.

The official disclosure establishes Cleaver made formal CPF requests, including Heroes Home Gate Campus. The later $850,000 presentation indicates a reduced amount for at least that project, supporting partial delivery rather than full confirmation.

partial same_term A for effort

FY24 Community Project Funding Disclosure | Congressman Emanuel Cleaver
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 78%

Contest this evidence item

The law makes FY2024 appropriations and gives the explanatory statement effect; HUD EDI funds are for CPF/CDS projects in that statement's table.

This proves the FY2024 appropriations vehicle enacted Community Project Funding/Congressionally Directed Spending through official law text, but the excerpt does not by itself verify Cleaver's full $13,103,920 or all twenty projects.

partial same_term

Public Law 118-42, Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 74%

Contest this evidence item

The law states no rescission may come from amounts specified for CPF/CDS in the FY2024 explanatory-statement table and amends/adds to that table.

This provides additional official confirmation that FY2024 CPF/CDS table amounts were protected and adjusted in enacted law. It supports enactment context, not full district-level delivery.

partial same_term

Public Law 118-47, Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2024
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 72%

Contest this evidence item

Section 1111 says FY2024 earmark, CPF, or CDS language has no legal effect for funds appropriated by the FY2025 continuing appropriations division.

This is a limiting fact: later FY2025 continuing appropriations did not automatically carry forward FY2024 earmark language. It leaves the broader all-project delivery claim unresolved absent recipient-level grant or payment records.

unresolved same_term

Public Law 119-4, Full-Year Continuing Appropriations and Extensions Act, 2025
secondary · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 79%

Contest this evidence item

Assessments

partial same_term A for effort

Cleaver formally pursued FY2024 Community Project Funding requests for district projects, and FY2024 appropriations laws enacted CPF/CDS funding mechanisms, supporting that he materially advanced the promised funding. There is also concrete same-term evidence of delivery activity for at least one related project, including an $850,000 federal investment presented for Heroes Home Gate Campus. However, the record provided does not verify that the full $13,103,920 across all twenty projects was enacted in the exact claimed amounts and delivered to recipients, and later appropriations language does not automatically prove carry-forward delivery. This supports partial fulfillment rather than full delivery.

provider codex_cli · model gpt-5.5 · confidence 80%