Shaheen said she is offering amendments to require DHS to consult communities before new ICE detention or processing facilities
Will require DHS to consult communities before new ICE detention or processing facilities are opened.
Occurrences
Evidence
Shaheen said she was offering an amendment that would require DHS to consult with communities before establishing new ICE detention or processing facilities.
The Congressional Record printed Shaheen's Respect for Local Communities Act amendment, which would require public notice, a 30-day comment period, and written approval from state and local officials before a new ICE processing site or detention center could be opened.
Mrs. Shaheen submitted an amendment to S. 1383 adding the Respect for Local Communities Act, which would block DHS from starting a new ICE processing site or detention center until public notice, comment, and written local-and-state approval conditions were met; the amendment was ordered to lie on the table.
Shaheen's office said she offered amendments to the Republican reconciliation bill to require transparency on ICE facilities.
The reported bill would require DHS to get consent from governors and local officials and allow a 30-day public comment period before new facilities opened.
Assessments
Shaheen materially pursued the promise in her current Senate term by drafting and submitting legislative text that would require DHS to provide public notice, allow comment, and obtain state and local approval before opening new ICE detention or processing facilities. However, the evidence shows the amendment was tabled and the policy was still only being pushed as an amendment in June 2026, not enacted as a binding DHS requirement. Under the stated rule, a serious legislative attempt that did not deliver the promised outcome counts as never, with effort credit.
Jeanne Shaheen materially advanced the policy by drafting and offering an amendment and having the consultation-and-approval language printed in the Congressional Record, but the evidence does not show that DHS was actually required to consult communities before opening new ICE detention or processing facilities. This is a serious legislative attempt that fell short of enactment, so the promise was not fulfilled.